My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1997 12 15
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1997
>
AG 1997 12 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:32:25 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:54:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/15/1997
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I CASA~L~S CO~]N~ ] <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Board of Commissioners <br /> <br />Blair Bennett <br /> <br />December 1, 1997 <br /> <br />Property Tax Relief for Elderly and Permanently Disabled <br /> <br />The current law in North Carolina entitled "Property Tax Relief for Elderly and <br />Permanently Disabled" is noted below. Some individuals refer to this as the Homestead <br />Exemption. <br /> <br />North Carolina excludes from property taxes the first twenty thousand dollars <br />($20,000) in assessed value of certain property owned by North Carolina residents <br />aged 65 or older or totally and permanently disabled whose disposable income <br />does not exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). <br /> <br />The current valuation lost as a result of the $20,000 Property Tax Relief for Elderly and <br />Permanently Disabled is $39,208,937 or $258,779 of the levy. To increase the Property <br />Tax Relief for Elderly and Permanently Disabled to $25,000 would result in a total lost <br />valuation of $49,000,000 or a total of $323,400 of the levy. Therefore, the increased <br />exemption would result in an additional $64,621 of lost tax revenues. If the income <br />threshold was also increased, then many additional citizens would qualify for the <br />exemption; however, I cannot predict the financial impact should you also consider that <br />element. <br /> <br />In discussions with Terry Rowland, the Tax Assessors Association normally requests the <br />General Assembly to raise the excluded property amount simultaneously with raising the <br />disposable income level. A bill was proposed this past year as follows but failed to pass: <br /> <br />S421 "To amend the Constitution of North Carolina to authorize the General <br /> Assembly to enact legislation allowing each county to (1) increase the amount <br /> of the property tax homestead exemption for low-income elderly and <br /> disabled individuals in that county and (2) raise the definition of "low- <br /> income" so that more elderly and disabled individuals can qualify for the <br /> exemption." Sen. Roy Cooper (Nash). This bill would provide for a statewide <br /> <br /> Finance Department <br /> <br />P O. Box 707 · Concord, NC 28¢26-0707 * t704) 788-8!04 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.