AG 1994 01 18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes December 16, 1993 Page 8 Mr. Laney said to Mr. Amos what they have here is a 50 foot strip through a hay field mowed. He said they plan no further construction. It is a simple matter to abandon should there become more beneficial uses to the property at some later date. They did not want to tie it to an airstrip use only. Mr. Amos asked Mr. Marshall about the letter from Juanita Smith, from the U.S. Department of Transportation, they gave restrictions relative to proximity of the runway to near by roads and such, is this the responsibility of Mr. Laney, the owner, to ensure that that takes place, or is that his responsibility, and if it is his, has he verified that these distance restrictions have been met. Mr. Marshall said that would be the FAA responsibility and Mr. Laney to ensure to them. Mr. Laney said that was the State's concern before issuing the permit. He said this has been a long drawn out process for over two years to get to this point. Mr. Laney said the answer to Mr. Amos question is that the State has satisfied themselves to that extent by issuing their permit after the Federal. The Chair asked Mr. Laney if he would agree to these conditions. Mr. Laney said yes, he agrees to those 3 conditions. There being for further comments, the Chair closed the public hearing on Petition 93-11, asking if anyone would have a motion concerning this petition. Mr. Amos MOTIONED to approve Petition 93-11 with the 3 conditions as stated: The airstrip use will be limited to no more than 5 separate ultralights (as defined by the FAA), Flight hours will be limited the between 30 minutes before sunrise to 30 minutes after sunset, and 3. The airstrip will remain grass only. The motion was seconded by Mr. Jordan and the vote carried unanimously.