My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1994 05 16
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1994
>
AG 1994 05 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:32:17 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:58:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
5/16/1994
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At 11 o'clock A.M., the Cabarrus County Board of Elections <br />met and received from the registrars and judges of elections for <br />the several precincts in the County of Cabarrus the returns of <br />the special bond referendum held in said County on May 3, 1994 <br />upon the question of approving $81,000,000 School Bonds of said <br />County. <br /> <br /> After said returns had been canvassed by the County Board of <br /> <br />Elections, W. 6. WALT KIEFER introduced the following <br />resolution which was read: <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CANVASS OF THE <br /> RETURNS OF THE SPECIAL BOND REFERENDUM HELD <br /> IN THE COUNTY OF CABARRUS, NORTH CAROLINA ON <br /> MAY 3, 1994 UPON THE QUESTION OF APPROVING <br /> $81,000,000 SCHOOL BONDS AND DETERMINING THE <br /> RESULT THEREOF <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Cabarrus County Board of Elections: <br />Section 1. The returns of the special bond referendum held <br />in the County of Cabarrus on May 3, 1994 upon the question of <br />approving $81,000,000 School Bonds of the County of Cabarrus <br />having been received from the proper election officers and having <br />been canvassed, this Board has found and determined and does <br />hereby declare: <br /> <br /> (a) That each registrar and judge for said referendum was <br />duly qualified by law and had taken the necessary oath. <br /> <br /> (b) That the election officers had incorporated in their <br />returns not only the number of votes cast for and against the <br />question submitted, but also the number of voters registered and <br />qualified to vote in each precinct in said referendum. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.