My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1994 08 15
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1994
>
AG 1994 08 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:33:06 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:58:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
8/15/1994
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF ANALYSIS - PETITION 94-03 <br /> <br />The petitioner is requesting a change in zoning to permit construction of an office/commercial <br />use. He is asldng that the zoning be changed from Low Density Residential (LDR) to General <br />Commercial-Special Use (GC-SU) for 6 acres on U.S. 601 South approximately one quarter of <br />a mile north of Cai Bost Road. The change would permit the construction of a building <br />contractor office and equipment storage area, and in the future allow a landscaping company and <br />nursery on the property. <br /> <br />There are two main areas to consider in the analysis of this request. The first is whether the <br />scope and effect of the proposed uses exceeds that of uses that are currently permitted. The <br />current LDR zoning permits residential uses along with a mix of agricultural, commercial and <br />institutional uses. The permitted, and permitted by standards, uses include banks, convenience <br />stores, gas stations, kennels, nursery/greenhouses, and restaurants. These uses, even with <br />standards applied, may still have a major impact on surrounding properties. <br /> <br />The two proposed uses would seem to be of similar scale and type to the permitted uses. A <br />landscape and nursery company would be permitted based on standards in the current zoning, <br />so that use alone would not constitute a major change. The contractors office is proposed to be <br />2,100 square feet in size which fails close to the scale (2,000 square feet) called for in the <br />standards of some of the uses that are currently permitted. <br /> <br />There may be a negative effect on surrounding properties from the storage and movement of <br />contractor equipment. The petitioner has addressed this on his site plan through the retention <br />of a natural vegetated buffer, and by locating the equipment storage area behind the office <br />building. This is an issue, however, that may require further review by the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />The second major consideration with this rezoning is the integrity of the overall zoning pattern. <br />The larger area surrounding this property is all Low Density Residential. There is an area of <br />Limited Industrial approximately one mile to the north on U.S. 601, and a Limited Commercial <br />area approximately one and a half miles to south near N.C. 24-27. The current land uses on <br />U.S. 601 are mostly rural residential, but there are a number of non-residential uses nearby <br />ranging from rural home occupations to the Concord Motor Speedway. The final Point is that <br />the special use zoning process was put in the ordinance to permit specific uses that would be, <br />with conditions, of similar type and scope of uses already permitted in the surrounding area. <br /> <br />The staff recommendation on this petition was split. The proposed use of the property was not <br />in question. Staff felt that this use could be properly located in this area. The point of <br />contention was whether the building contractor storage yard should be permitted by standards <br />in the zone, or possibly that any use that would be allowed as a rural home occupation be <br />permitted by standard whether a house was located on the property or not. <br /> <br />We recommend that this rezoning be approved and that this case be revisited during the <br />scheduled review of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.