Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> <br />they voted because it was unverifiable and private. <br />mind: <br /> <br />With that in <br /> <br />7. On Monday, June 13, 1994 the Cabarrus County Board of <br />Elections conducted a hearing on complaints in Areas I and II <br />concerning ineligible voters voting in the referendum and <br />eligible voters denied their right to vote in the referendum. <br /> <br />The Board in its "FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER" <br />concluded that "No action be taken as to complaints set forth' in <br />Issues III and IV PENDING determination by the State Board of <br />Elections on the determination and recommendation set forth in <br />response to Issue I" The Local Board, to expedite a <br />conclusion, requested the services of 3 court reporters to enable <br />the transcripts to be completed by the June 16, 1994 scheduled <br />meeting of the State Board. <br /> <br />8. A Cabarrus County Board of Elections member and the elections <br />supervisor, at the request of the Attorney for the mixed drink <br />referendum, Todd Williford, traveled to Raleigh to hand deliver <br />the transcript to the Executive/Secretary Director on June 15, <br />1994, so the State Board could have this available for their <br />scheduled meeting on June 16, 1994. <br /> <br />9. The State Board's regularly scheduled meeting on June 16, <br />1994 was postponed until June 22, 1994, because an insufficient <br />number of State Board members were able to be present to call for <br />a new election/referendum. At least two State Board agenda items <br /> <br /> <br />