Laserfiche WebLink
e) <br /> <br />d) <br /> <br />used to reach and work with them. However, it quickly became apparent <br />that this was a very different and challenging population. Job Training <br />and Partnership Act (JTPA) income guidelines were very Iow which limited <br />the men served to those who had not been employed in the recent past. In <br />addition, many had no stable residence, and were living with family or <br />friends, which could also potentially effect eligibility, as a parents' <br />income could be considered. Many of these clients have had multiple <br />problems and barriers to employment, including very low self-esteem, <br />substance abuse problems, and no reliable means of transportation. <br />Another problem encountered was that some had no incentive to participate <br />due to the fact that they were working on a cash basis. This was to avoid <br />evidence of employment, thus avoiding child support. <br /> <br />The social work staff has worked with many of these men to get through <br />some of these problems. They have counseled them, advocated for them, <br />and supported them to help them work through many of their conceptions <br />about their responsibilities as fathers. They have assisted them in <br />purchasing proper clothing using project funds as well as arranging for <br />grooming through local beauty colleges and barber shops. <br /> <br />The local Employment Security Commission has been involved by contracting <br />with the agency to supply an Employment Counselor that determines JTPA <br />eligibility as well as to develop On-the-Job Training (OJT) contracts. <br /> <br />The District Court system plays a very strong role in the program, as <br />many of the absent fathers are court ordered to cooperate with the <br />program. Refusal to participate can mean that they can be found in <br />contempt of court. <br /> <br />The Costs: There were no developmental costs incurred in the planning <br />and start up phase of Jobs for Dads. The JOBS social work staff were <br />very knowledgeable about employment and training activities and were able <br />to modify the JOBS concept to tailor it to absent fathers. In addition to <br />social work and employment counseling time being devoted to the program, <br />there were training costs from OJT employers. Other costs included <br />participation and work related expenses such as uniforms, tools, and <br />driver's licenses. Finally, there was added support in the form of <br />transportation. These men were either reimbursed or had transportation <br />arranged for them to defer their expenses while they were training. The <br />program has been cost effective, as the expense for services to these men <br />from assessment to training to employment has averaged only $456 per <br />absent father. This is a small investment to pay in return for making them <br />taxpayers as well as having them assist in the support of their children. <br /> <br />This program was initially funded for 1992-93 in the amount of $42,356, and <br />in 1993-94 for $63,010. The funding source was the North Carolina <br />Employment and Training Grant Program (NCETGP), which uses state <br />funding for various job training programs, and adheres to JTPA eligibility <br />guidelines. <br /> <br />The Results: The results of this program have been outstanding in both <br />its success with absent parents as well as publicity through awards and the <br />media. Of the number of referrals received by the program, thirty (30) <br />men have been found to be eligible and were processed, assessed and <br /> <br /> <br />