Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> <br />SIX MONTHS MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES STATUS <br /> <br />(Continuation Programs Only) <br /> <br />In the space provided, please list each measurable objective in your current <br />program agreement and indicate the degree to which your program has been <br />successful in achieving them, (Use data from the first six months of the <br />fiscal year.) <br /> <br />(Except where noted, most data presented below are from the February 1992 <br />CBA Quarterly Report (YC340-2), for the six month period from July 1, 1991 - <br />December 31, 1991). <br /> <br />Statistics from the CBA Quarterly Report indicate that the Home-Based <br />Program well exceeds CBA Minimum Standards for referrals by court/law <br />enforcement, problem behaviors by youth, and referrals of youth as <br />delinquent/status offenders. The required state compliance levels for <br />these three areas are 35%, 50%, and 80%, while the statewide average for <br />all Home-Based Services programs during the same time period is 61%, 82%, <br />and 86% respectively. CBA Minimum Standards require programs to meet at <br />least one of the three components. The Cabarrus County Home-Based Program <br />complies with all of these components at the 100% level since all referrals <br />originate from the Juvenile Court Counselors and Judges. <br /> <br />The most recent monitoring visit by the Regional CBA Consultant was <br />conducted in October 1991 for the Home-Based Services Program. The program <br />was found to Be in compliance with all CBA policies and procedures. <br /> <br />Other measurable objectives are the following: <br /> <br />1. Developed a service plan for 100% of the children in the program. <br /> <br />Thirty six youth were served during the July 1, 1991 - March 31, 1992 time <br />period. Some of these youth went into foster care or group care following <br />assessment while others received short-term assistance to help the families <br />access other community resources. Seventeen of the youth have proceeded <br />through the entire home-based program. <br /> <br />2. Reduced possible out-of-home placements by 40%. The intervention of the <br />worker helped to prevent foster care or training school placement. Of the <br />youth served Between January 1991 - December 1991, 40% were at home at the <br />time of termination from the program, with 50% in foster care or group care. <br />The remainder were with relatives or other living arrangements. There were <br />no training school co~itments. Without the Home-Based worker's <br />intervention, all of these youth would probably have been placed in foster <br />care or group care directly from Juvenile Court. <br /> <br />3. Reduced involvement in the Juvenile Justice, S,stem}, ,,yB 71%. The CBA <br />Report indicates that court referrals decreased by 71% and runaway Behaviors <br />decreased By 62%. <br /> <br />4. Helped increase school attendance pro,ram for youth. The Home-Based <br />worker has been successful in getting youth Back into school and encouraging <br />school attendance. At the time of termination from the program 90% of youth <br />yemained enrolled in school for calendar year 1991. <br /> <br /> <br />