Laserfiche WebLink
ISSUES AND GOALS <br /> <br />The issues and goals for the Western A.rea were compiled to help formulate the recommendations of this <br />plan. It is important to know what residents and business owners believe are the most important issues <br />affecting them and also what their goals are for the future of the area. <br /> <br />A number of sources were used to formulate the list of issues and goals. Among these were the preliminary <br />staff study of the area, the community meetings held with area residents, individual meetings with major <br />land owners and businesses, and a questionnaire distributed at the community meetings. A summary of the <br />questionnaire is included in the appendix of fids document. <br /> <br />Issues covered a broad range and there was often disagreement about goals for the area. Some residents for <br />instance either considered growth inevitable and good while others wished to retain the sparse rural <br />development pattern that still typifies much of the area. Both residents and business representatives, <br />however, agreed that if growth is inevitable then the basic infrastructure of the area must be upgraded. <br /> <br />The brief discussion of issues that follows is divided into four categories. These are the same categories <br />that the recommendations section will be divided into also. Many of the issues and concerns are related and <br />some may be contradictory, but each is important in arriving at the plan recommendations. <br /> <br />LAND USE ISSUES <br /> <br />Current land use, discussed in the "Existing Conditions," demonstrates that land use and growth vary <br />considerably across the planning area. The considerable variation has caused conflicts between existing and <br />new development. There have even been conflicts between different types of new development. This <br />planning document represents a common plan to be followed regardless of jurisdiction, that w'ill control <br />and/or eliminate future conflicts. Both planning entities and residents of the Western Area strongly support <br />this approach. <br /> <br />The study area of the Western Area Plan has the most rapidly growing residential, commercial, and <br />industrial sectors within the County. With this growth has come concerns about property values, the <br />environment, and transportation facilities. There is also an overriding concern that a balance must be struck <br />between the amount of residential growth and job growth through new commercial and industrial activity. <br /> <br />Residents had fairly consistent views about the type of residential development that should occur. Most <br />felt that it should be medium to Iow density and almost everyone believed that it should be site built, <br />single-family homes. There was a basic belief that multi-farrfily housing and mobile homes are not desired <br />in the area, even along major roads with utility services in place. In contradiction, however, residents <br />agreed that affordability of housing is a major concern, and slightly higher density and the use of modular <br />housing (which meets N.C. State Building Code) were two approaches to reducing cost that were <br />mentioned. <br /> <br />Residents and business representatives recognized the existing major ~'ansportat~on corridors as the prime <br />industrial/commercial development sites. These corridors are 1-85, U.S. 29, N.C. 73 and N.C. 49. It was felt <br />that non-residential growth should be encouraged on these corridors and discouraged in areas not in close <br />pro)cimity to the major roads. <br /> <br />There was less agreement about two planned major roads. Residents agreed that the planned King's Grant <br />interchange and parkway would be good sites for non-residential development, although many felt <br />removed from the growth because of the lack of an easy connection between the new road and the general <br />area. <br /> <br />The larger disagreement surfaced over the role of the planned Westside Bypass in non-residential <br />development of the area. It is the opinion of both planning departments, and most residents, that this road <br />to properly function should have limited access and commercial/industrial growth only where it intersects <br />the other major transportation corridors. Other residents and landowners, specifically those who will <br />WESTERN AREA PLAN DRAFT4 PAGE8 <br /> <br /> <br />