Laserfiche WebLink
QUALITY OF LIFE RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Quality of life is an idea that is finding its way into land use plan studies. It is a concept planners and <br />citizens are finding valuable in defining what constitutes an area's 'qivability.'. Abundance of parks, <br />attractive scenery, and cultural amenities along with high quality design and development contribute to a <br />community's livability. Highly livable communities are attractive, with urban sprawl minimized and <br />goods and services convenien_tly located. Following is a discussion of some items which are based on <br />residents' comments and are perceived as threats to the quality of life in the study area, and a solution or <br />combination~ of solutions. <br /> <br />Retention of Trees and Natural Features The study area encompasses both high density urban development <br />in areas near and within the pr/ncipal corporate limits of Concord, and rural development in the further <br />reaches of the County. Large tracts of undeveloped and agricultural land are located most notably in the <br />western reaches of the study area. Clustering and planned unit development techniques can be used to <br />provide housing stock and to allow for nonresidential development that preserves scenic views and natural <br />vegetation. These tools allow the developer to place structures closer together, reducing the cost of <br />infrastructure installation, and in some instances, increasing the number of allowable housing units in <br />exchange for preserving natural features and using common open space. A study developed by the <br />MasSachusetts Deparm~ent of Environmental Management and the Center for Rural Massachusetts entitled <br />Dealing With Change in the Connecticut River Valley: A Design Manual for Conservation and <br />Development, specifies design guidelines for a rapidly growing semi-rural area of western MasSachusetts. <br />Design standards such as these can be developed and encouraged as a way to help preserve trees and natural <br />features. <br /> <br />Affordable Housing Providing for housing that is affordable to a wide range of the population rather than <br />to a small minority should be a goal for every commurdty. Now, more than ever, households are spending a <br />greater percentage of their income on housing. One affordable "pilot" housing project, Chadbury, has been <br />developed in Concord, on the south side of Rock Hill Church Road. The developer was granted limited <br />waivers in utility policy and several variances in order to cut costs and to pass the savings on to the <br />homeowner. Further study of this project will determine whether this particular approach to the <br />development of affordable housing has been successful. Coordination with and input from the Chamber of <br />Commerce's Real Estate and Construction and the Concord Affordable Housing Task Force during pro~ct <br />review should continue, and further study of the issue by both the County and City should be undertaken. <br />Continued support should also be given to agencies such as Habitat for Humanity, which encourage and <br />advocate affordable housing. Both the City and County should initiate additional ways to create decent <br />and affordable housing opportunities. <br /> <br />One such program would appear to be the HOME Investments Partnership Program. This program was <br />created as part of the t990 National Affordable Housing Act. The HOME program is designed to develop <br />affordable housing opportunities for low and very low income persons. If communities are awarded funding <br />/:or this program, rehabilitation as well as new construction of housing can be done using the funds. <br /> <br />Environmental Degradation and Aesthetic Values Some of the issues relating to aesthetics and the <br />environment have been touched on in the discussion of preservation of trees and natural features. Residents <br />have expressed concern regarding noise, air, and visual pollution. Both Cabarrus County and the City of <br />Concord have adopted some manner of noise ordinance, and a telephone call to the respective jurisdictqon is <br />an appropriate first step if a resident feels that a noise is excessive. The State of North Carolina <br />Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources and the Federal Environmental Protection <br />Agency (EPA) adrrdnister air pollution regulations. Some jurisdictions, most notably in other states, have <br />adopted performance standards, which state specifically the maximum noise level or the maximum <br />emission level produced by a specific land use. The County is currently developing a performance based <br />zoning ordinance, and the City already has already incorporated development standards into their <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Aesthetic controls and the quality of development in the study area was high on the priority list of many <br />residents. There are existing techniques to assure quality development and there is a great potential for the <br />development of more detailed performance standards to guide development in the area. One <br />nongovernmental approach comes under the heading of "deed restrictions and protective covenants." These <br />WESTERN AREA PLAN DRAFT 4 PAGE 23 <br /> <br /> <br />