Laserfiche WebLink
Comparison of Charlotte and Orlando <br /> <br />~ ~e 1~ ~v~p~ ~ of ~ fa~: <br /> <br /> o In No~t Ca~lina ~d <br /> a~.ini~t~cd ~t~ugh a ~btgl~ univ~i~ <br /> <br /> o ~te Ot~otte and Orlando M~s ~e c~parable in s~ ~ alrca~ notc~ Otarlotte ~ r~kcd <br /> 34t1~ ~te Orlando M~ <br /> <br /> o l~th ~NC ~lotte wtd ~e ~niv~i~ of C~t Flodd~ caOt M~ i5 x~cd by a 5btgle public <br /> un~v~i~. ~'cith~ r~ott h~ a I~ com~r~h,e p~uate uni~i~. <br /> <br /> o ~NC~lotte~d~te Hnh~i~of~tralFIogdacamcintobeingataboutgte$ametim~ <br /> <br />~ of~ of ~ <br /> <br />~j~ ~li~ ~ of <br />~ ~ off~ a <br />~ 30,~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ or ~ of i~ off~ <br />si~. ~~ ~ ~la~of ~~at~lic <br />~i~ ~ ~ ~~ <br /> <br />~v~i~ ~ ~ ~ <br /> <br /> Concluding Comments <br /> <br /> ~gmn z~viewed in isolaticn or ~hen ~ with other lazge z~gic~s Jn the <br /> <br /> ~tic~. ~he lack of a major research univ~ity is a ~=at 'i,tl.~llmmlt tt:) ~ <br /> ~ti~ developer of the a~i~ and, thmz~fore, to the futur~ w,~ll--be~ of <br /> all of North Caz~lina. <br /> <br /> ~he (~rlotte ~us of ~he University of North Carolina f~ the o~ly institution <br /> that can dmal with this inadequacy. ~her~for~, it ~ p~ct~d that L~C (~arlutba <br /> be fo~l/y identified as the state's nex~c major r~,c~h u~iversity an~ that the <br /> lm~l~r~h/p of ~ ~S b~ oharg~d with developing a plan for achievinq that <br /> q0~ over a period of t/me consistent with the state's and univ~ity's fiscal <br /> <br /> <br />