Laserfiche WebLink
REzONING ANALYSIS. Petition #91-02, Robert & Avis McCoy .............. Page 3 <br />the cleaning up of the site as it becomes usable. <br /> <br /> In Summary. The question may be raised as to what is likely to happen if the <br />property is nor rezoned. Consider then its current zoning district, C-I, a <br />"neighborhood serving" commercial district. Xt seems highly unlikely that any <br />rational entrepreneur is likely to lease the building, given the surrounding <br />landscape alld lack of population density. It is difficult to conceive of a restaurant, <br />shoe repair shop, or newsstand sales, or the like, typical of the p~.rmitted uses of <br />C-l, locating in this area. As to rezoning to I-l, it is the ]ess intense 9f the two <br />industrial zones. Among its permitted uses are warehousing, storage manufacturing <br />and railroad stations and yards, all of which are found in the area presently with the <br />exception of the railroad station/yard. This, too, ts a future possible use as rail <br />does lie close to the property in question to the north. <br /> <br />ASSESSMENT: <br /> <br /> Issues or Concerps. The chief issue concerning this property is its status as <br />both vacant andunused. The current zoning category m/ght haYebeen appropriate <br />in the area in the ]950's when the area was in transition. The town's center no longer <br />exists and a C-1 use serves neither the property owner nor the community. The <br />requested I-] zoning district would serve both. Rezoning appears to be the crucial <br />element in finding this property productivity in another use. <br /> <br /> Consistenc~ with the cabarrus Comprehens~ue Plan. while rezoning this <br />propert~ is not reflective of the curren~ comprehensive plan, it must be noted that <br />the current plan is basically a mirror of current land use and is very general in <br />nature unlike the precise small area plans the Department is currently employing <br />For the record, tt should be noted that this property's current zoning classification <br />~s not reflecti~ie of the comprehensive plan, the plan showing the area as rural <br />residential. The close proximity to the largest industrial area in the southern portion <br />of the Count~ in addition ~o the fact that the property is adjacent to I-2 lands, ]ends <br />credence to rezoning to an industrial category. Should this property be rezoned, the <br />comprehensive plan should ba corrected to show light indnstrial for the area. <br /> <br /> An~)vsis Of E~s~oq Zone. The deficiencies of the existing zone, C~], have <br />been pointed out above. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION: <br /> <br /> It is recommended that the property in question be rezoned from c-l, <br />a neighborhood serving commercial district, to I-l, a light industrial zone. To <br />briefly summarize the foregoing, the area is one of transition. Its status as a <br />commercial/retail center has been Gone for several decades, what has remained or <br />come to the ~ea are light industrial type uses. Zoning should compliment and <br />reinforce what could be a trend of salvation for the area. <br /> <br />Sue G. Russeil, AICP <br />Rezoning Coordinator <br />Februar~ 12, 1991 <br /> <br /> <br />