My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19900917
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1990
>
AG19900917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:14:33 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:05:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
9/17/1990
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT - CORRECTIVE REZONINGS <br /> August 6, 1990 Page 3 <br /> <br /> penny nail will hold much better than the eight penny nail. <br /> Once a sixteen penny nail has been driven into the tiber gl <br /> the board, an eight penny nail won't work in that same hole. <br /> There Are many other lessons that can be explained by <br /> following through this analogy. <br /> <br /> To overzone an area can effectively weaken an area's <br /> developme'nt. From the staff's standpoint the neighborhood <br /> cor~nmercial zoning district is the beat fitting zoning <br /> district for the area. The zone allows a wide variety of <br /> neighborhood and community serving businesses in this small <br /> land area. At the same time it allows the possibility of an <br /> upgrade il in fact the intersection and the area' take on a <br /> larger community regional scale in the tut'ute. The plan did <br /> specify that it would be evaluated and updated ~s public <br /> investments in and around the Area were developed. <br /> <br />Similarly, to continue to dissect the area around the <br />already small scaled intersection would be in error in lhal <br />it would be an indication that one area of the intersect ion <br />is serving at a different scale than another area. <br />Obviously, this is not the situation. Had the majority of <br />the study area not already been developed, if traffic <br />volumes would have been signif icanlly higher on N.C. 73, and <br />public improvements would have ~lready primed a large area, <br />then a split claasif iceS. ion over & larger land area with <br />different road frontages would make sense. This, bow=var, <br />is not the situation. <br /> <br />COMMERCIAL ZONING - THE COLD SPRINGS/N.C. 73 ARE~ <br /> <br />In conclus~Ono C~t zoning for the Cold Springs/Highway ?3 <br />intersection area reflects both. the majority opinion and the <br />preferred planning practice. Aa A final note, however, with <br />the ~dvant of special use "SU" district zoning in Cabarrus <br />County, an individual desiring a heavier commercial 'use than <br />Ihat allowed in C-t could present e rezoning request using <br />the special use technique. In so doing, the use can still <br />be compatible and consistent with the smell area plan. <br />Accordingly, even as C-1 becomes the primary zoning district <br />of the area, it still has not completely precluded an <br />individual Irom lalloring a zoning district to tit both <br />his/her needs while blending in and complimenting the <br />residential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Res..p~t__p,J,.f..,Udly su~tted0 <br /> <br /> Sue Q. Russell, AICP Michael Downs, Zoning <br /> Admlnlatralor <br /> / <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.