Laserfiche WebLink
I-1 (PDO-I) REZONING REPORT <br /> PETITION 86-35 <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br /> On October 13, 1986, Mr. Sam Davis, Attorney for Walter and Mary Welch filed a <br />petition to rezone a 30.3 acre 'tract east of U.S. Highway 6D1 on N.C. 24/27 from <br />A-2 to I-1 {PDO-I). The PDO-I submission is voluntary on part of the applicant and <br />is intended to ensure that planning staff concerns, possible neighboring property <br />concerns and stated intentions of the applicant and prospective buyer are considered <br />and addressed in the rezoning process. The prospective buyer is Pepsi-Cola Bottling <br />Co. of Charlotte, Inc. Their stated purpose for purchasing this tract is to <br />construct a distribution facility. An information sheet a map of the subject <br />property and surrounding area is enclosed. <br /> <br />Review <br /> <br /> Section 3.9~6{4) of the Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance requires that the <br />County Planning Director review the proposed PDO in five areas and then make a <br />recommendation for approval or denial. The following revi~v addresses these five <br />areas and additional concerns of the Planning Department. <br /> <br /> (1) Suitability of Proposal - the PDO planned is appropriate for the type of <br /> use (industrial)~c6nt~niplat~d~he.physi~al character_istics_of-the land <br /> are also~condds.iv~-~t~:th~-type~r~cili~ty.~)yla~-~6d.~ .... <br /> <br /> The area ~round the subje6~ property can be~tbe termed rural agriculture ...... <br /> with mixed~]ow~enki~y:d~v~lopment.,~long..N.C-.~.~4t2?: ~tur~ develo~ent'--~--'~ <br /> for the area-~tl~rob~bly:remain'.rural-~in ~nature.exc~pt.fom-N~C. 24/~7 .... ~;-- <br /> which is~-scheduled.'~:b~.fOdr~laned.:~t~in-~he~ext :ten~(~O)~ear~¥·In .... <br /> ~dition ~-~bdn~ water:;has:n~ce6tly~been:'extended-a-lo~'g-maj~-sectibns ' ' <br /> N.C. g4/2Z :~nclbdi~g -t~e,:~ppl icants,,pfoper-ty~hese, improvements -~i 11' · ~:-' .'-' <br /> create pressure:to~-trip'develop this:hi§hway.::.:~: .- <br /> <br /> A straight rezoning of the applicants property to I-1 could be detrimental <br /> to surrounding areas and the desirable long term development of N.C. 24/27. <br /> With the proposed I-1 (PDO-I) th~ Planning Board has an opportunity to <br /> impose conditions which would prevent negative impacts of industrial <br /> development. <br /> <br /> Most of Cabarrus County's thoroughfares are or will experience pressure <br /> for strip development. These thoroughfares main purpose is to move <br /> traffic efficiently and they should not be allowed to be clogged with <br /> strip development. At the same time many of these roadaays present <br /> the county's major opportunities for industrial and commercial develop- <br /> ment. Land use techniques must be developed to try and maximize both <br /> functions and at the same time promote an attractive environment for <br /> county residents to live. <br /> <br /> Two emerging techniques for accomplishing these goals are cluster <br /> developments with large amounts of open space and performance based <br /> zoning which allows greater flexibility in types of uses allowed, but <br /> imposes strict standards of development to ensure that the use is <br /> compatible with adjacent development. I believe such concepts can be <br /> <br /> <br />