My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19840402
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1984
>
AG19840402
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:13:53 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:12:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
4/2/1984
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
" ~ CABARRUS COUNTY <br />(..~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />· · Post Office Box 707 <br />~.~.~.~. CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA 28025 <br /> <br /> MEMORANDUI4 <br /> <br /> TO: Charles D. McGinnls/County Manager <br /> FROM: ThOmas B. Robinson/Planning Director ~6~ /~-(~ <br /> SUBJECT: Duplicate Street Names within the County <br /> DATE: March 5, 1984 <br /> <br /> One of the work activities of the Planning Department is the elimination of <br /> duplicate Street Names. Well over a year ago, the Board of Commissioners directed <br /> the Planning Staff to try and secure voluntary agreement on road name changes <br /> from affected property owners. This effort met a stonewall of resistance. <br /> People who have lived on a roadway for a long period of time understandably are <br /> not receptive to having the name of their street changed. <br /> <br />I have talked to a couple of people and read material where duplicate street <br />names have been successfully eliminated and the main approach has been to do <br />the renaming quickly. Develop new names and a methodology for which street will <br />carry the original name, then advertise a public hearing, hold the public hearing <br />and make the change. In neighboring Stanly County, they held public meetings <br />by township. They changed their duplicate street names before street signs were <br />put up and used the signs as leverage to change the street name. They would not <br />install a street sign until the duplicate street name was eliminated. I do not <br />know of any leverage we presently have. <br /> <br />About two months ago, I held a meeting with representatives of all the jurisdic- <br />tions within the County to go over the duplicate street name problem. The <br />concensus of the meeting was that only duplicate street names occurrin§ totally <br />within a jurisdiction should be eliminated. Later other duplicate street name <br />problems could be considered. <br /> <br />The Planning Staff needs to know how the Board of Commissioners want to proceed <br />on eliminating the duplicate street names within Cabarrus County. Attached is <br />a copy of the duplicate street names occurring in Cabarrus County's jurisdiction <br />only. <br /> <br />Attachment <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.