AG19830104 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jan 12 COG BOARD Members should be ready to respond to Governor's upcomimg SDA plan with their alternative. If members wish Centre!ina to act as an SDA, COG must agree to do so and those members should pass appropriate re- solutions! delineating the SDA and naming the CEO (OPTION lc). Feb. I Governor designates SDA's Involved local governments should (~ould slip to b~rch) bmve agreed on methods of setting up PIC (OPTIONS 2a, b,c,) so agreed up CEO can respond in writing to Governor's plan. Feb. 15 Governor receives appeals CEO(S) seek SDA designation (.e.g: to "opt out" of state SDA could be ~yor for Charlotte/He6k- plan and/or finalizes SDA's. lenburg, Chaieman for'Gaston County and COG Chairman for other counties). Mar. 1 Nominations received for PIC's. If designated, each SDA would receive private sector nominations from Chambers of Commerce, plus appoint other members. Mar. 15 PIC appointments made by CEO *COG board should make PIC appoint- ments. If members voted on OPTION 2c, they should have made their selec- tions earlier. *COG (and each counny involved) should be ready to stipulate the ex- tent they want to work on planning with the PIC (OPTIONS 3a, 3b, 3c]. Resulting PIC structure sent to governor). Apr. 1 Governor cert~ias PIC's Apr. 15 New PIC's convene PIC (and its staff) conv~e, nominate businessman chairman, review past programs, then prepare agreement with local governments (select version of OPTIONS 3a, 3b, and 3c). >~y 1 State publishes planning At this point PIC begins preparing guidelines (draft) training plan for service delivery. Local governments should be reviewing *OPTIONS 3d and 3e if they want to be in the contractual chain and OPTION 3f if they want veto power.