Laserfiche WebLink
unnecessary due to these choices it is estimated that 25% of the <br />"potential users will choose not to use the supplied water. This <br /> <br /> reduces the average daily demand toi8.23 (24.3MGD - (24.3MGD x .25))MGD. <br /> Mt. Pleasant is already in the process of procuring their own source. <br /> This further reduces the demand by .87 MGD, leaving a daily demand <br /> of 17.36 MGD. <br /> <br /> User Breakdown <br /> <br /> Based on existing water use, and adding in the residential rural <br /> users expected to connect to the system, a breakdown by user of the <br /> water by customer type in the future is as follows: <br /> <br /> Residential: 41% <br /> Commercial: 21% <br /> Industrial: 38% <br /> <br /> Note that the addition of the primarily residential water users caused <br /> a shift in these precentages. <br /> <br /> Required Additional Water <br /> <br /> As shown in Table 1, current water surface water sources have 16.04 <br /> MGD .available for treatment and use. <br /> <br /> To meet 2010 demands the following quantities will be required: <br /> <br /> 17.36 MGD Average Daily Demand <br /> x 1.33 Maximum Dse Factor <br /> 23.09 MGD Maximum Daily Demand <br /> <br /> 23.09 MGD 2010 Water Need <br /> -18.23 MGD Current Available Water <br /> 4.86 P~D Additional Need <br /> <br /> ALTERNATIVES TO MEET ADDITIONAL NEED <br /> <br /> General <br /> <br /> Water to meet the additional 4.86 MGD storage requirements could <br /> be obtained from either ground or surface water sources, or bought <br /> from another system. Several different alternatives have been proposed, <br /> and they will be individually discussed. <br /> <br /> -6- <br /> <br /> <br />