My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19821206
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1982
>
AG19821206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:14:56 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:15:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/6/1982
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· · · · · · <br /> <br /> CAR CIq~Y OF CONCOI~I), INC. <br /> <br /> November 18th, 1982 <br /> <br /> Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners Cab. County <br /> P.O. Box 707 Bill # 43662 <br /> Concord, N.C. 28025 Acct# 1282400 <br /> Yr-'76- $336.96 <br /> Dear Commissioners: Int. 121.31 <br /> <br /> The purpose of this letter is to contest a charge that <br /> has recently been levied against this company relating <br /> to a 1976 property tax which I have been told is a, qUote, <br /> 'discovery tax.' <br /> <br /> Some years ago, when the new evaluations were placed into <br /> effect, the tremendous increase in property taxes for those <br /> of us who depend on inventory to survive~were contested by <br /> some of the automobile dealers in the county. I was one <br /> who appeared before the board for some consideration in <br /> the matter. The final outcome was for us to pay the taxes <br /> as assessed. We were given months to .pay the taxes and <br /> made huge payments, thousands of dollars, during these <br /> months to get even with the board on the tax evaluation. <br /> <br /> When paid, we were assured that this brought all taxes, <br /> past & present (at the time) up to date. No other taxes <br /> would be charged in years passed. This particular inci- <br /> dent was 'discovered' Withln the past few months, and to <br /> my knowledge was not 'discovered' prior to recently. No <br /> notice or bill has been sent to us prior to this one. <br /> <br /> This poses many questions. The past County Tax Collector, <br /> who was in charge at the 1976 time of question, is no longer <br /> in office. Apparently, it would do no good to ask for his <br /> testimony or opinion. Why did 6 or 7 years go by before this <br /> was brought up? <br /> <br /> I ask that this 'discovery' tax not be charged us. There <br /> are questionable circumstances in the matter. In addition <br /> our city & county taxes amount to tremendous sums each year, <br /> most of which is 'inventory taxes.' Those of us who have <br /> to pay inventory tax feel it is unfair taxation. Most pro- <br /> fessional people, who earn considerably more than many mer- <br /> chants with inventories, pay no tax at all. Property taxes, <br /> real property, are ususally figured fair and eqOitable for <br /> all citizens and businesses. No complaint here. <br /> <br /> -7/ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.