Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT TO PROPOSAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR CABARRUS C00N~Y <br /> <br /> MOTDR0[A;.PARTI Ii, & III $q7,897 <br /> TWO-WAY;RADIO'pFCAROL'INA, PART I, II., & III 42,2~o~'°~-'~ <br /> TWO-wAY R~b'io' SER~ICE~ PART I,. II, & III §o,41A <br /> REIN'=' PXRT I ~YEE~ ONLY - 13,194 <br /> MAC VICTOR~ PART'III 8,296 <br /> <br /> SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br /> I. IT ~S RECOMMENDED THAT ALL THREE"PARTs BE AWARDED TO TWO-WAY <br /> RADIO oF:C~ROLINA. THIS ~ECOMM~NDATION IS BA~D ON TWd-WAY <br /> RADIO~' AcCePTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING CHANGES ¥0 THEIR PROPOSAL. <br /> I. REFERENCE PAGE 2 OF ~OVER LETTER~ <br /> <br /> RAIN DURING TPE 150 DAYS PROPOSED FOR THE COMPLETION <br /> OF THIS dOB IS-ALMOST A CERTAINTY IN CA~ARRus COUNT. Y. <br /> DELAYS RESULTING FROM RAIN ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. DELAYS <br /> RESULTING FROM ABNORMALLY HIGH RAINFULL WOULD BE ACCEPT- <br /> ABLE. <br /> <br /> 2. REFERENCE PAGE 2 OF COVER LETTER, PARAGRAPH Al <br /> <br /> THE CONDITIONS STATED RELATIVE TO SOIL CONDITIONS ARE <br /> OPEN ENDED AND NOT ACCEPTABLE'~ ~HE ~PECIFICATIONS <br /> -ASKED FOR A TOWER COMPLETELY WITH INSTALLATION. <br /> <br /> 3. REFERENCE PAGE 2 OF COVER LETTER, PARAGRAPH E: <br /> <br /> THIS CONDITION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE , THE SPECIFICATIONS <br /> IN Gl, PAGE 4 OF 7, PARAGRAPH 10, STATE ,THAT THE BIDDER <br /> MUST ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OF HIS <br /> PROPOSAL IN MEETING THE INTENT OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. <br /> <br /> 4. REFERENCE PAGE 2 OF COVER LETTER. PARAGRAPH F: <br /> THIS STATEMENT IS UNACCEPTABLE UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY <br /> A DETAILED WORK PLAN SHOWING: <br /> <br />'\ A.' EXACT NATURE OF WORK OR ACTION REQUIRED BY THE <br />/[. ~) ~ COUNTY, <br />~-~'~-',~ B. 0ATE wH~ SUCH WORK OR ACTION MOST BE COMPLETED. <br /> / C, IMPACT OR COSTS'IF SUCH WORK OR ACTION IS NOT <br /> ~ COMPLETED. <br /> THIS WbRK PLAN sHouLD BE~REvIEWED By THE COUNTY AND <br /> DETERMINED TO BE ACCERTABLE BEFORE AGREEING TO THE RE- <br /> OUIREMENTS OF PARAGRAPH F. <br /> <br /> THE EXCEPTIONS TAKEN BY TWO-WAY ~ADIO TO Gl, PAGE 3 OF <br /> PARAGRAPH 6, ARE ACCEPTABLE. THE TECHNIQUE PROPOSED TO ME~T <br /> THE INTENT DF G2~ PAGE 2 OF 2~ PARAGRAPH 9 IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE. <br /> <br /> II. IN THE EVENT THAT T~O-WAY RADIO DFCARDLINAREFUSES TO ACCEPT <br /> THE CONDITIONS STATED IN I ABOVE, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE <br /> AWARD BE MADE TO THE NEXT LOWEST BIDDER - MOTOROLA; MOTOROLA <br /> TOOK NO MAJOR EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICA- <br /> TIONS, <br /> <br /> <br />