AG19760805 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r,,~i..,~ihle federal or~ci.], ri.der ibc Nadp:hal I'~nvimmn~nlal Policy Act of t969, in.far as the provisions of said Act ,. l,k l, t ~c HUD .:s ~ ~ltsibilili~ for envJronme al m~ew, decis on-making and nclion assum6O mid carried oul by :~.ld circtd~diou of draft inid final ~fivironmenM impact slalements, and ~stnnplton of lend agency r~spon~bd~li~s For pr~p Th~,l llsa na~isigfi~d chi~Fe~ecu'l~ve officer 6f applicant i~ attlhori~d to ~on~nt, p~er~o~lly, and on beh'~f 6f c el, ~o ~ccapt~ib~ judsdieliou 6"Ibc l:ederal courts, for die enforcemeot of all the ~fo~esaid responsibilities; ~nd fl~at lhe I:li;. ~ ~gned does so conse, I, on fielMf of applicant mid of Ih~ nudersigncd, ia ~he official capacity of tl~e und~tsigned. ~aimnat/, Box 707, Codcord, N~~ 'C'~'.c28025 ' ' , 7. AUTtlENTICATION: ~fel, i~f ~eet~i~ffieer~ .- . .m~ ~ po ~c O~.~_B~ 70Z~d, ~, c. 28025 CI~R'I'IFICATE OF A]~ORNEY: A. L~I ~ Ol~a~ being the c~cfexecutive officer of~~~{sexecul~d tho for~- ~ing Request/iht Re ea~ ol ,'uuds ~d Ccrtifica, on m d has consented, as t ,~rctn ~ area, ~[sonally ~d ou the a~plicanl and said c]~ of ~x6cutive ol'fic~r ~r~ aufllorized al d empowered by law to make I lC ~aid R¢Tohse of Fuuds :md CcrliHcalion and the smno was dnly made by them in accordno~ wi~ stroh authority ~d power. Nd claim of legal iuc~paciW puts ~ant to 24 CFR 58.5(b) I~as ~:en made by ~fi~ applicant. $Tf~)' being the chief executive offi~r or-(name ofapolictmt; has executed, the fore- app~eant mad said chief executive officer are authorized and empowered ['y law to make tho said Rcquesl fo~ IS:Wet. Y~:~ applicant made a claim of lack of legal capacity pursuant to 24 CFR 58.5(b) ~d ~c11 elcdm was dcuied by [IUD. There has been no final decision by a court of competellt jurisdiction or legl~ation which has become effective since the denial of such claim wbkb may affect the denial. t . i-3 'Hfi~ es~plica~ lea claim of lack of legal capacity pursuant to 24 CFR 58.5(b) prior to ~bmitfiug its g[ant applic.~liou. Such claim was denied by IIUD on the basis of its assessment of applicable law. ac the basis of that ' ~ (fi'qmc o[clde[ e~ccutit'c offiec~] ~ . . . (name o~ applicant) half of the applic ~ t ~ his officiM capacity as clfie f c~ecutivc artier only, ~d not ofi~etwi~, and has determined ~1~ it auch execution aud consent am author~ed ~d cmpowefcd by la~$. Undorsig~ed certifies only that foregoing sialcmcnt is factu~ly correc~ and thai ~erc has been no final dec s on by a court of core.tent jmi~diction or Ic~ifl:dion which bas become cfl~ctivo since thc IIUD denial which may affect the denial. ~rnev~ Cuba~rus ~oun~y ~ 1~7 Un,on Stree~ So~th, C6ncord, N.C. 28025