BC 2013 08 19 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

August 19, 2013 (Regular Meeting) Page 1712 (e5) whether payment of the civil penalty by the petitioner will prevent payment for any remaining, necessary remedial action. (4i) After submitting a petition for remission, the petitioner shall provide such additional information and records as may be reasonably necessary or convenient to the Executive Director's consideration of the petition. The Executive Director may remit the entire amount of a civil penalty only when the petitioner has not been assessed civil penalties for any prior violation of this Article or by State or Federal authority enforcing substantially similar provisions and the payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment of any remaining, necessary remedial action_ SECTION 11 - AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS 11.1 Upset (a) An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards if the requirements of paragraph (b), below, are met. (b) A user wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: (1) An upset occurred and the user can identify the cause(s) of the upset; (2) The facility was at the time being operated in a prudent and workman -like manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and (3) The user has submitted the following information to the Executive Director within twenty -four (24) hours of becoming aware of the upset (if this information is provided orally, a written submission must be provided within five (5) days): (i) A description of the indirect discharge and cause of noncompliance; (ii) The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and (iii) Steps being taken and /or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. (c) In any enforcement proceeding, the user seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall have the burden of proof. (d) Users will have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of upset only in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards. (e) Users shall control production of all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails. 11.2 Prohibited Discharge Standards Defense A user shall have an affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought against it for noncompliance with the general prohibitions in section 2.1(a) of this ordinance or the specific prohibitions in sections 2.1(b) (2), (3), (5) through (7), and (9) through (31) of this ordinance if it can prove that it did not know, or have reason to know, that its discharge, alone or in conjunction with discharges from other sources, would cause pass through or interference and that either: