Laserfiche WebLink
Movember 29, 2012 (Special Meeting) Page 1305 <br />that the office is declared vacant at that point and then the commissioners <br />would appoint a new office - holder. <br />White: The instance that I'm thinking is that if on day - well on January 5th <br />of whatever the year in the next four years - the bonding company says we're <br />dropping you, we're not going to bond you anymore. There's going to be a lag <br />time from January 5 th until whenever day a bond is made; January 6 January <br />10 - business is going to be conducted from January 5 th until that new bond <br />is made. My question is does business get conducted during that time or can <br />we shut down the register of deeds office in order to make certain that we're <br />insured or that there is a bonding, that there is no lapse. <br />Koch: I think 161 -6 addresses that. Let me just look at it again. <br />White: When I read 161 -6 that means - to me that meant that if the register <br />of deeds steps down and a deputy steps in then the bond of Western would <br />cover that deputy. What I'm saying is- <br />Koch: Yeah, that's a holdover situation, yes. <br />White: Right and I'm not talking about a holdover situation. I'm saying if <br />the bonding agency says we're not going to bond any longer - we're not going <br />to stay on this bond as of January 5, 2013, 2014 - name the day. If there is <br />a lapse, how do we conduct business during that lapse? <br />Koch: Well, I was gonna go back and look at Mr. Small's bond. Let me start <br />out by saying that - that no business can be conducted unless a bond is in <br />place. We'll start from that, that's in the statutes and I can find it, but <br />so - but under the bond, the bonding company has to give 30 days' notice <br />before they can cancel or revoke the bond. So there is a 30 day window in <br />which the bond would still be in place even if their intent was to revoke it <br />or terminate it, for some reason. And certainly, in that period of time <br />there would be, presumably be sufficient time to determine whether another <br />bond could be put into place by one of those methods I just described. <br />White: Is the county listed as a party that is supposed to be noticed if <br />they come off this bond? <br />Koch: The way it was originally issued was to Cabarrus County, and then yes, <br />the county is to be notified by certified mail. Now if you go back to the <br />letter that I talked about the technical deficiencies, statute says that the <br />bond is to be payable to the state, it doesn't say anything about the county <br />even though it's up to the county - this board to approve and also this board <br />is the one that is potentially at risk if there's some issue. And I think <br />that was the reason because of that discrepancy, if you will, among those <br />statutes, that the - that we typically have it made payable jointly to the <br />state, to comply with that statute; and to the county, as their interest may <br />appear in order to make sure that we're the beneficiary of any notice that <br />was to be sent. So but there is - right now that's the way it was originally <br />issued, it runs strictly to the county. And so we would - <br />White: That's on liability. <br />Koch: That's on- <br />White: Everything. <br />Koch: That's on everything. <br />White: So we will get notice under what you have. <br />Koch: Yes. <br />White: Okay. Do you know if that's changed? <br />Koch: I do not. <br />White: If we do not - if we do not make a decision today to approve or deny, <br />what happens next? In other words, by the end of this meeting if we still <br />have more information - or we're still trying to get more information - so no <br />decision is made to approve or deny the bond - or no decision is made to <br />approve the bond, what happens? <br />Koch: On the issue of whether Mr. Small can be sworn in or not, then I <br />couldn't really tell - give an opinion on whether that has to be - whether <br />the bond has to be in place before he is sworn in. He cannot conduct any <br />official duties unless there is an approved bond in place, so he does have a <br />document that on its face appears to be a bond that has certain defects in it <br />- which, you know, presumably can be corrected. But before he can assume the <br />duties of the office there has to be an approved bond and that approval is <br />the function of this board. <br />Burrage: How long is it gonna take to correct the defects? <br />Koch: Well, the ones that are listed in the letter would be I think a <br />question properly directed to Mr. Small. I said I've had no communication <br />with him since that letter was sent. My understanding was that he was going <br />to address the Board concerning those items. The other that I was speaking <br />of, I couldn't answer how long it would take to - to deal with any issues <br />that, that this Board may have aside from what's in that letter. It would <br />certainly depend on what they are, but I really don't know for sure. That <br />would really be up to what those issues were, if any, and how fast the surety <br />or Mr. Small could respond to. <br />White: You know what I'm getting at is, if we were to ask for a copy of the <br />application for the bond and Mr. Small did not have that today, and was not <br />able to get that until after the 3 what happens? <br />Koch: There is a - well I think we would go back to the holdover provision <br />of Chapter 161 that we were talking about earlier that makes provision for <br />