Laserfiche WebLink
June 6, 2011 (Work Session) <br />Page 463 <br />By utilizing these three funding sources, the program will be <br />funding without any impact on the tax rate. <br />VII. Next Steps. <br />1. Approve the concept, to include management structure option. <br />2. Amend budget to allocate funds for establishment of the <br />program. <br />3. If needed, Develop contract /MOU between the county and one or <br />more local rescue groups. <br />4. If maintaining program in house, create job description and <br />hire Animal Services Director. <br />Commissioner Carruth advised the initial estimate for funding of <br />$80,000.00 has been reduced to approximately $70,000.00 which would include: <br />1) salary and benefits for an adoption coordinator position, 2) supplies and <br />veterinarian services and 3) office supplies and IT support, for the position <br />to be able to handle the process. He advised approximately $17,000.00 has <br />already been identified as previously existing shelter fees and approximately <br />$53,000.00 additional funds will be needed. He also reviewed the Animal <br />Adoption Continuum chart as follows: <br />Ms. Cannon advised that most owners who surrender their pets do so <br />because of behavior problems usually caused by the families themselves. She <br />advised the Cabarrus Pet Society offers behavioral training services to <br />participating families. She stated these services would be the rescue <br />organizations' responsibility for animals surrendered to Animal Control. She <br />also responded to questions from the Board. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued with Commissioner Carruth responding to a <br />variety of questions. During discussion, Chairman White suggested the APPAC <br />develop the program matrix and advised there may be County staff available to <br />coordinate this program to eliminate additional cost to the County. <br />Discussion continued. No action was taken with regard to the budget. <br />Discussion for Fire District Tax Rates - Harrisburg Rural <br />Michele Reapsmith, Harrisburg Town Administrator, and Chad Baucom, <br />Harrisburg Town Councilman, reiterated the Town's request presented on May <br />31, 2012 for a two (2) cent tax increase on the rural fire district tax rate <br />to maintain the current level of service and equalize the "in -town vs. out - <br />of- town" rates. It was noted that a letter of support from Mayor Hagler <br />dated June 3 had been provided to the Board. <br />Ms. Reapsmith addressed several questions related to maintenances <br />issues and their desire to address safety issues first, salary increases, <br />etc. <br />Commissioner Carruth expressed his intent to support the request. <br />However, the remaining Board members were not in favor of granting the <br />request. <br />ANIMAL ADOPTION CONTINUUM <br />Day 0 <br />1 1 <br />1 2 1 3 <br />4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 <br />1 9 1 10 1 11 <br />12 <br />13 14 <br />15 16 <br />Responsibi <br />Private <br />Animal Control <br />Animal Services Coordinator <br />Rescue <br />lity <br />[Organizations <br />Activitic5 Aninrcal lntaf�n- Ai rb.arantinn Pndnd— <br />I. Tnmpnmm�nt Tncfing'nm{�Intnd <br />I. PirYnp Animal: <br />L Pickup L RaL•ics Hold <br />2. Anima! As;igncd to Adoption Category <br />As Early as Day 4, <br />T. Rdinquished 2. Criminal Evidence <br />3. For Non-Cat 4, FuIIVet Exam Pcrfomed <br />when animal <br />3.Owncr Reclaim <br />-0. Cato Animal Euthanimd <br />completes <br />Animal Servimz: Animal Seviccs: <br />i. Ramaining Animals Assigned to Categories l3 <br />temperament <br />1. Entered into Cond.tct Initial <br />n. Wily Adoption List Updated & Disv buted to Private Rescue Network <br />testing and vet <br />Dataoasc icmp_ramentTesting <br />r• R =uue Urpups Pimp Animals <br />exams. <br />2 Pic Po•tcd to (Mon - Rabic: Holds Only) <br />S. Euthanasia of Day 15 Animals IF Space is needed and By priority: <br />2. Pravidp Fodor <br />lVebsite <br />• Category ? <br />Care for Animal <br />3. Initial Vet <br />Category <br />untilAdopted <br />DWm:& <br />• category <br />3. Screen and <br />vvrinarinnc <br />Evaluatcall <br />Adoption <br />Applicants & <br />Complete <br />Adoption Process <br />Commissioner Carruth <br />recognized Ann Cannon, Animal <br />Protection and <br />Preservation Advisory Committee ( APPAC) member and <br />Cabarrus <br />Pet Society <br />member, in attendance. He <br />also responded to questions <br />from <br />the Board on the <br />reasons why pets are surrendered <br />to Animal Control. <br />Ms. Cannon advised that most owners who surrender their pets do so <br />because of behavior problems usually caused by the families themselves. She <br />advised the Cabarrus Pet Society offers behavioral training services to <br />participating families. She stated these services would be the rescue <br />organizations' responsibility for animals surrendered to Animal Control. She <br />also responded to questions from the Board. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued with Commissioner Carruth responding to a <br />variety of questions. During discussion, Chairman White suggested the APPAC <br />develop the program matrix and advised there may be County staff available to <br />coordinate this program to eliminate additional cost to the County. <br />Discussion continued. No action was taken with regard to the budget. <br />Discussion for Fire District Tax Rates - Harrisburg Rural <br />Michele Reapsmith, Harrisburg Town Administrator, and Chad Baucom, <br />Harrisburg Town Councilman, reiterated the Town's request presented on May <br />31, 2012 for a two (2) cent tax increase on the rural fire district tax rate <br />to maintain the current level of service and equalize the "in -town vs. out - <br />of- town" rates. It was noted that a letter of support from Mayor Hagler <br />dated June 3 had been provided to the Board. <br />Ms. Reapsmith addressed several questions related to maintenances <br />issues and their desire to address safety issues first, salary increases, <br />etc. <br />Commissioner Carruth expressed his intent to support the request. <br />However, the remaining Board members were not in favor of granting the <br />request. <br />