BC 2011 10 17 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

October 17, 2011 (Regular Meeting) Page 642 7. A covered employee fails to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete. 8. A covered employee fails to provide a urine specimen for any drug test required by Part 40 or DOT agency regulations. 9. A covered employee fails to permit the observation or monitoring of a specimen collection. 10. A covered employee fails or declines to take a second test the employer or collector has directed you to take. 11. A covered employee fails to undergo a medical examination or evaluation, as directed by the MRO as part of the verification process, or as directed by the employer as part of the "shy bladder'' or "shy lung" procedures. 12. A covered employee fails to cooperate with any part of the testing process (e.g., refuse to empty pockets when so directed by the collector; behave in a confrontational way that disrupts the collection process). 13. Failure to sign Step 2 of the Alcohol Testing form. 14. Failure to follow the observer's interactions during an observed collection including interactions to raise your clothing above the waist, lower clothing and underpants, and to turn around to permit the observer to determine if you have any type of prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process. 15. Possess or wear a prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process. 16. Admit to the collector or MRO that you adulterated or substituted the specimen. P. Cabarrus County will notify North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles within five business days of the date that a DOT regulated employee with • commercial driver license tests positive or refuses to participate in • drug or alcohol test required under 49 CFR Part 382 and 655, in accordance with NCGS 20- 37.19. d— is trs eel within 1 19 - 0 E il _ s of the farffiei farfft. :7 cf a rTa J - e hie1-e inelu Eles a fe rest r y�ie , e that ia eeacs t1a pi ste a (F -6) Human Services Building Upfit - Selection of Architectural Design Firm A request for Qualifications (RFQ) for architectural services was posted on June 29, 2011 for the upfit /renovations of the Human Services Building. Eight (8) qualification packages were submitted and were reviewed by the internal selection committee comprised of County employees. Upon review of the RFQ submissions, four (4) firms were identified by the committee and chosen to make a formal presentation and respond to specific questions related to the proposed project. Presentations were conducted on September 2, 2011. The internal committee voted after the presentations and Yates, Chreitzberg, and Hughes was the selected architectural firm. The RFQ summary is as follows: RFQ Summary for HSC HA Renovations (July 2011) Please note that each firm felt no structural or civil engineering would be needed which is most likely correct, some elected to ". ��hfe , _ d Mechanical/ e h, e Architectural Natierral G�aa-r�, eicd:�eH by tlz�e ty , Location. :-R NOTES while the NT-atienal aetive ei� Grand fftd:44-4.-a-rc, dkaty, iH -- -1 ' er mcfftbeL=s of t when en aetrae per- sici =f ems;, =- - - - -- 't'er'se le ., t ,T-r funetiens t't"I'tT I'['[eeCS l .,..� `_� QlTt the f e ll ewiRg _ - - _ _ - -, 1- l.. b, t he f -, trr��c�e� t_'� I '� '� lots of DSS l -r nl a�S ee ___– _ - and nus ed -e�iel b. is te- -_c�. a nd _r_.____ e Ei u s r ely€ transpeL-t __ e rim use; �,., S ___ p e fa_r die s is be � h te and in t agrie a3jeiedaets ,faicEmaehine3yel f r-e :mot i e - f f hi -me:�e . Irmo, SC Sims e. net used -i ep e r a n s o o eic i-e r ear-- r r-ld d— is trs eel within 1 19 - 0 E il _ s of the farffiei farfft. :7 cf a rTa J - e hie1-e inelu Eles a fe rest r y�ie , e that ia eeacs t1a pi ste a (F -6) Human Services Building Upfit - Selection of Architectural Design Firm A request for Qualifications (RFQ) for architectural services was posted on June 29, 2011 for the upfit /renovations of the Human Services Building. Eight (8) qualification packages were submitted and were reviewed by the internal selection committee comprised of County employees. Upon review of the RFQ submissions, four (4) firms were identified by the committee and chosen to make a formal presentation and respond to specific questions related to the proposed project. Presentations were conducted on September 2, 2011. The internal committee voted after the presentations and Yates, Chreitzberg, and Hughes was the selected architectural firm. The RFQ summary is as follows: RFQ Summary for HSC HA Renovations (July 2011) Please note that each firm felt no structural or civil engineering would be needed which is most likely correct, some elected to ". .:list who they would use if the project did require those disciplines Mechanical/ Architectural Location Structural Location Plumbing/ Location. Civil Location NOTES Firm Electrical lots of DSS county buildings MEAJ Charlotte ARP Irmo, SC Sims NA NA as well as GC Architecture and health clinics in other counties, plenty