Laserfiche WebLink
October 17, 2011 (Regular Meeting) Page 655 <br />appraising, the realities of the local market along with state and local laws <br />must be considered. Also, fundamental to any mass appraisal system are <br />knowledge, judgment and the ability to adapt a standardized system to the <br />local market. A standardized system and method of handling both data and the <br />application of the three basic approaches to value is necessary to achieve <br />equalization and uniformity in the valuation process. <br />The three basic approaches which may be used to arrive at a fair market value <br />are summarized as follows: <br />COST APPROACH <br />MARKET APPROACH <br />INCOME APPROACH <br />This approach consists of estimating the land value <br />and the depreciated cost of the improvements to arrive <br />at a value. Theoretically, the substitution principle <br />is the basis for determining the maximum value of the <br />property by this approach. The substitution principle <br />assumes the value is equal to the cost of acquiring a <br />substitution of equal utility assuming no cost delay <br />is encountered. <br />This approach utilizes the application of prior sales <br />data from the market and is also referred to as the <br />sales or comparison approach. Use of this approach <br />requires that the sales used should be analyzed to <br />determine that the conditions of fair market value <br />have been satisfied. <br />The two most common applications of this approach in <br />mass appraising are the capitalized net income and the <br />gross rent multiplier. <br />The use of any of the three approaches requires careful consideration to be <br />given to: <br />1. The relevancy of the approach applied to the property under <br />consideration. <br />2. The inherent strengths and weaknesses of the approach used. <br />3. The amount and reliability of the data collected. <br />4. The affect of the local market on the data collected. <br />This standardized system or Schedule of Values is designed and adopted to be <br />used to establish Fair Market Value as of January 1 of the Revaluation year. <br />Revaluation projects are mandated by State law to be performed every eight <br />years unless the Board of County Commissioners desires to perform the <br />projects more frequently. In the interest of maintaining fair and equitable <br />values for the taxpayers of Cabarrus County the Board of County Commissioners <br />has passed a resolution establishing a four year reappraisal cycle for <br />Cabarrus County as required by G. S. 105- 286(a) (2). <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />TO ADVANCE CABARRUS COUNTY'S REVALUATION SCHEDULE <br />FROM JANUARY 1, 2012 TO JANUARY 1, 2008 AND TO IMPLEMENT SUBSEQUENT <br />REAPPRAISALS EVERY FOUR YEARS <br />WHEREAS, Cabarrus County completed and implemented its most recent <br />reappraisal of real property on January 1, 2004, utilizing its own staff and <br />personnel; and <br />WHEREAS, Cabarrus County desires to conduct a reappraisal of real <br />property earlier than required by G.S. §105 -286, to be effective January 1, <br />2008, and to implement subsequent reappraisals every four years; and <br />WHEREAS, the reappraisal work will be conducted by the staff of the <br />Cabarrus County Assessor's Office as part of its program of work each year; <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Cabarrus <br />County ( "Board ") that in the annual budget ordinance for fiscal year 2007 -08, <br />the Board shall include an appropriation for Tax Administration in the amount <br />required for reappraisal work during that fiscal year consistent with a plan <br />established for the reappraisal of real property, as required by GS §153A- <br />150; and <br />