Laserfiche WebLink
March 15, 2010 (Regular Meeting) <br />Page 18 60 <br />3. The Cabarrus County taxes in the amount of approximately <br />$2,700.00 need to be repaid to my client, either by the tax <br />assessor, GMAC Mortgage or perhaps by Mr. Glass. <br />We performed two detailed title searches prior 10 <br />completing this foreclosure, and I also understand that Mr. <br />Miller's attorney did the same; unfortunately, bankruptcy <br />searches of prior owners in the chain of title are not part of a <br />normal title search. Further exacerbating matters is the fact <br />that North Carolina law does not require assignment of these <br />notes and deeds of trust to be recorded, which is asinine in my <br />opinion. As attorneys we should all work together to have that <br />law changed. Also contributing to this mess was the fact that <br />neither the Alstons nor CIT Group responded to any of our many <br />letters and telephone calls to them regarding amounts owned and <br />foreclosure proceedings. Had either of them bothered to pick up <br />the phone and inform us as to what was going on, none of us would <br />be in this situation. In any event, all of these factors <br />contributed to a "perfect storm" that has resulted in the above <br />situation. Your cooperation in further cleaning up this matter of <br />record and in fairness to all parties is requested and greatly <br />appreciated. Please contact me at 704-721-3500, ext. 102 at your <br />earliest possible convenience after you have had a chance to <br />review this matter in order to discuss final resolution, <br />especially with regard the taxes owed to my client. Thank you for <br />your assistance in this extremely important and time sensitive <br />matter. <br />Yours, <br />MORETZ & SKUFCA, PLLC <br />/s/ Zac Moretz <br />Zachary M. Moretz <br />cc: Research City, LLC (via hand delivery) <br />Because the Alstons' bankruptcy was not discovered in the title <br />searches and because the McAfees never legally owned the Piney Church Road <br />property, Mr. Moretz urged the Board to consider refunding the taxes or to <br />apply them to other real property Mr. McAfees own. He also responded to a <br />variety of questions from the Board related to the process of buying of <br />foreclosure property. <br />Edward McAfee addressed the Board and acknowledged he is a commercial <br />real estate broker and a property investor. He also urged the Board to <br />consider applying the ad valorem taxes paid on the Piney Church Road property <br />to other real estate he actually owns in Cabarrus County. Further, he <br />offered to intervene on the Board's behalf should the refund be challenged. <br />In response to questions from the Board, Mr. Koch advised he cannot <br />confirm the legal historical ownership of the property without conducting a <br />thorough title search. <br />Mr. Moretz pointed out that Research City, LLC (McAfees) deeded the <br />property back to the Alstons, the legal owners, by filing a quit claim deed <br />to clean up the public record. <br />Mr. Koch responded to a variety of questions from the Board related to: <br />who has the authority to make the Commissioners pay if a refund is granted; <br />can an agreement be drafted to protect the Board; can the County collect <br />taxes in a bankruptcy situation; have the 2009 property taxes been paid; etc. <br />Commissioner Mynatt expressed support for refunding the monies or <br />applying them to other property owned by the McAfees. <br />Vice Chairman Poole suggested this item be tabled for 30 days until <br />more information can be obtained on the status of the 2009 property taxes and <br />County's position/ability to collect the property taxes through a Chapter 13 <br />bankruptcy proceeding if a refund is granted. <br />Mr. Koch asked if title insurance was obtained when the McAfees <br />purchased the property and which district is the bankruptcy is located in. <br />Mr. Moretz reported insurance was not purchased and that the bankruptcy is in <br />the western district. <br />Mr. Moretz asked if tabling the item for 30 days would satisfy the <br />action requirement set forth in N.C.G.S. 105-381(b). Mr. Koch advised that <br />the Board is within its power to table this item if the taxpayer understands <br />