My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2009 05 19 Recessed - Budget Meeting
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2009
>
BC 2009 05 19 Recessed - Budget Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2009 9:08:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:02:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
6/17/2009
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 19, 2009 (Recessed Meeting) <br />Page 1387 <br />Conservative projections suggest general fund revenues will not <br />reach the original FY 2009 forecast until FY 2012. Obviously, a <br />reordering of the county's five year financial plan is required. <br />1f the projections hold true, it will not be possible to avoid a <br />property tax rate increase in FY 2011 without an unfavorable <br />impact on service delivery. Further, the amount of the tax <br />increase will be higher if current plans are realized to finance <br />the construction of four new schools and a high school classroom <br />addition in June, 2009. <br />Two alternative five year financial plans are presented for the <br />Board's consideration, both with emphasis placed on minimizing <br />property tax rate increases while the recession drags on. <br />Continuation of the operational reductions proposed for FY 2010 <br />left school construction financing and other capital projects as <br />the only significant and controllable variables affecting the tax <br />rate. <br />One alternative (option A, page 66) calls for financing the <br />construction of two middle schools and a high school classroom <br />addition in June 2009 and financing the construction of two <br />elementary schools in June, 2012. This financing plan calls for <br />capitalizing interest payments for 2.5 years and using cash from <br />the state's school capital improvement fund (approximately $2.9 <br />million), lottery proceeds (approximately $2.7 million) and from <br />mitigation payments from the adequate public facilities ordinance <br />(approximately $3.9 million. This scenario requires a 1.5 cents <br />tax increase in FY 2011 and another 1.5 cents increase in FY <br />2012. This plan then holds the tax rate at 66 cents through the <br />FY 2013 revaluation and in FY 2019, allowing for the financing of <br />an additional $33 million in school construction projects in FY <br />2013. <br />The second alternative (option B, page 67) proposes financing all <br />five school construction projects in June, 2009 (again, <br />capitalizing interest for 2.5 years and contributing cash from <br />the same three sources as in the first alternative). This plan <br />results in tax increases of 2 cents in FY 2011 and another 2.5 <br />cents, to 67.5, in FY 2012. The tax rate is then reduced by a <br />penny to 66.5 cents in the revaluation year of FY 2013 and in FY <br />2014, producing enough revenue to finance school construction <br />projects totaling $54 million in FY 2013. <br />With the exception of the school construction projects described <br />above, the two plans include the same five-year capital <br />improvement programs (reduced in scope from the FY 2009 CIP due <br />to funding limitations), found on page 73. <br />Of course, many other scenarios can be developed during the <br />course of the Board's budget deliberations, each with varying <br />results and costs. The staff and I are pleased to assist in <br />developing and reviewing various options proposed by the Board. <br />Opportunity in Crisis <br />The financial crisis we find ourselves in demands a reassessment, <br />at all levels, of the way we have conducted business and of the <br />way we have governed. One might argue our national business model <br />has been the Ponzi scheme. And as is true with all Ponzi schemes, <br />they eventually collapse because they depend on ever-increasing <br />levels or growth; that is, they are unsustainable. <br />We in Cabarrus County are very fortunate that our Board of <br />Commissioners had the foresight and leadership to abandon the <br />Ponzi scheme model before the world financial crisis began and <br />instead embrace a model based on the three balanced principles of <br />sustainability: a healthy environment; a sound, conservative <br />financial position; and social equity. This triple-bottom-line <br />approach tempers the value previously placed upon growth and <br />instead emphasizes conservation and prosperity. <br />The Board of Commissioners' initiative to build a sustainable <br />community consists of many efforts. Among them are programs in <br />the county organization and retrofits of county facilities to <br />conserve energy and water. Other organizational efforts include <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.