Laserfiche WebLink
August 15, 2008 (Recessed Meeting) Page 926 <br />It was noted the new contract is identical to the old one, except for the <br />dates. <br />Further discussions ensued, with the following topics being addressed: <br />the terms of the contract with the EDC; a 90-day termination clause within <br />the contract; etc. <br />Chairman White suggested the Board review the previous contract and <br />make note of any modifications that need to be made by September 8, 2006. <br />Further, each Board member stated their individual desire to execute the <br />contract. By consensus, the Board directed the County Manager to execute the <br />contract with the Cabarrus Economic Development Corporation. <br />Next, a discussion was held concerning the EDC Confidentiality <br />Agreement. John Day, County Manager, reported that it has been his personal <br />practice to not sign such an agreement, and that the Board of Commissioners <br />had not given him any direction regarding the execution of said agreement. <br />Further discussion continued, <br />Further, Richard Koch, County Attorney, addressed the issue concerning <br />the execution of legal agreements for incentive grants. He reported there <br />are several factors that affect the execution of legal agreements, such as <br />further negotiations and entity name changes. He also addressed the past <br />issue of grant recipients' attorneys trying to redraft the grant agreements. <br />A general and lengthy discussion ensued. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />The Board took a short break at 10:05 a.m. The meeting reconvened at <br />10:21 a.m. <br />Economic Development Grants - Continued <br />Following the break, the Board continued discussions with John Cox, <br />Ryan McDaniels, and Nicole Arnold regarding incentive grants in Cabarrus <br />County. Topics addressed included: efforts by the EDC to determine why the <br />County lost major projects, like IKEA, to surrounding counties; businesses <br />that have received incentive grants within the County; how the process of <br />rebranding the Countyaffects the EDC; the benefits of the County's existing <br />tagline: "Center of American Motorsports"; updating the County seal and <br />moving away from having a logo and tagline; Cabarrus County Schools' ranking <br />as it relates to amount of educational funding; economic development in <br />Cabarrus County as compared to similar counties in South Carolina; market <br />advantages of lowering the grant threshold from $1.5 million to $1 million; <br />the expansion of the transit system in Cabarrus County; light rail; etc. In <br />addition, a draft copy of the Economic Development Grant Program guidelines <br />was distributed. Chairman White stated Board action on the proposed <br />guidelines would likely occur in October and asked to have the guidelines <br />reviewed in the meantime. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />The Board took a short break at 11:27 a.m. The meeting reconvened at <br />11:37 a.m. <br />Jail Housing Unit - Turner Construction Company <br />Chairman White recognized Scott Milligan and Monty Taylor with Turner <br />Construction Company (TCC). <br />He also reminded Board members that at the August 9, 2008 Agenda Work <br />Session, Turner Construction Company presented the Guaranteed Maximum Price <br />(GMP) No. 4 of $57,962,999.00 for construction of the jail housing unit in a <br />notebook. The notebook also included savings generated by entering into a <br />contract for pre-cast cells and a report from Faithful + Gould, a consulting <br />firm that reviewed the GMP and made suggestions as to the reduction of costs. <br />He further reported that TCC has prepared a response to Faithful + Gould's <br />comments in the form of a matrix. <br />Mr. Milligan reviewed the matrix which identified the difference in <br />cost between Turner's estimate of $57,962,999.00 and Faithful + Gould's <br />response of $57,705,776.00. Painting and plumbing services, a difference of <br />$83,000.00 and $102,753.96 respectively, were specifically addressed. Mr. <br />Milligan responded to a variety of questions from the Board related to <br />subcontractors, "holds", potential savings by locking in contracts, safety, <br />etc. A general discussion ensued. Topics addressed included the following: <br />