Laserfiche WebLink
November 3, 2008 (Work Session) <br />Page 1033 <br />Commerce Department - Consent Agreement for The Grand Apartment Project <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented information <br />related to a request for a Consent Agreement for The Grand Apartment Project. <br />She stated the project received rezoning and site plan approval from the City <br />of Kannapolis Planning and Zoning Board on February 7, 2007. She further <br />reported the voluntary mitigation payment will be $1,331.00 per unit and the <br />complex is asking for 240 building permits to be issued in 2008. <br />Commissioner Privette MOVED to place the Consent Agreement for The <br />Grand Apartment Project on the November 17, 2008 Agenda as a New Business <br />item. Commissioner Carruth seconded the motion. <br />After Chairman White requested additional information from Ms. Morris <br />regarding school capacity prior to the Regular meeting, the MOTION <br />unanimously carried. <br />Commerce Department - Central Area Plan Implementation Phase Update <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented a report on the <br />Central Area Land Use Plan (CALUP). She reviewed the following summary: <br />• On June 29, 2008, the Cabarrus County and the City of Concord <br />executed an Interlocal Agreement regarding the Central Area Plan. <br />• On August 18, 2008, the Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners <br />adopted the Central Area Land Use Plan (CALUP). <br />• On September 18, 2008, the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning <br />Commission was presented with rezoning case C2008-04-R. This <br />case is the case that proposes the zoning classification changes <br />for the implementation of the densities as described in the <br />adopted Central Area Land Use Plan. The rezonings proposed in <br />this case are to lower existing densities to be consistent with <br />the CALUP. <br />• On September 18, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission decided <br />(by an 8-1 vote) to table the case for 60 days in order for the <br />Commission members to review the proposed rezoning information <br />and to perform research as needed. <br />• A majority of the October 16, 2008 Planning and Zoning meeting <br />was used by the Planning and Zoning Commission as a work session <br />meeting to discuss the Central Area Plan and the proposed <br />rezoning. <br />• As currently scheduled, the Planning and Zoning Commission should <br />render a decision regarding the proposed rezoning at the November <br />20th Planning and Zoning meeting. However, the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission does have the option to table the case again as <br />there are no State Statutes or local codes related to the number <br />of times that the Planning and Zoning Commission can table a case <br />that is before them for consideration. <br />NEXT STEPS <br />• Should the case receive an expedited vote in favor of or against <br />the rezoning, the action will be considered a final action and <br />will stand unless an appeal is filed. A vote is considered <br />expedited when the vote reaches 750 of the Commission in the <br />affirmative or voting for denial or when a vote is 7-2 or <br />greater. <br />• In the event that an appeal is filed regarding the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission's decision, the case would be forwarded to the <br />Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners to conduct a de novo <br />(anew) hearing at the next available meeting. <br />• In the event that the vote is a non-expedited vote (less than 7- <br />2) the case would be forwarded to the Cabarrus County Board of <br />Commissioners to conduct a de novo (anew) hearing at the next <br />available meeting. <br />• GSA 153A-344 states that "Subsequent to initial adoption of a <br />zoning ordinance, all proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance <br />or zoning map shall be submitted to the planning board for review <br />and comment. If no written report is received from the planning <br />board within 30 days of referral of the amendment to that board, <br />the Board of County Commissioners may proceed in its <br />consideration of the amendment without the planning board report. <br />The board of commissioners is not bound by the recommendations, <br />if any, of the planning board." This Statute permits the Board <br />