Laserfiche WebLink
April 16, 2007 (Regular Meeting) <br />Page 394 <br />UPON MOTION by Vice Chairman Juba, seconded by Commissioner Mynatt and <br />unanimously carried, the Hoard agreed to forward the proposed text amendment <br />to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval and to maintain the refund <br />policy as presented. <br />(G-10) Consent Agreement - Roycroft Subdivision <br />Kassie G. Watts, Planner, reported the Roycroft subdivision, developed <br />by T.D.W. Holdings, LLC of Charlotte, N.C., was approved by the Cabarrus <br />County Planning and Zoning Board on March 15, 2007 and consists of 361 <br />single-family residential units on +/-262.92 acres located on Flowes Store <br />Road. A consent agreement to address school APFO (Adequate Public Facility <br />Ordinance) requirements is required for the project to proceed. The Consent <br />Agreement includes the payment $9,039.00 per lot to advance school adequacy <br />that will be due at final platting and the following proposed build-out <br />schedule: no more than 99 lots platted in 2008, no more than 99 lots platted <br />in 2009, no more than 99 lots platted in 2010, and no more than 64 lots <br />platted in 2011. Finally, she reported that the APFO worksheet includes the <br />opening of Hickory Ridge High School. <br />There was a general discussion on denying the consent agreement. <br />Richard M. Koch, County Attorney, reviewed the options available to the <br />Board concerning consent agreements. <br />Chairman Carruth asked if the developer was willing to revise the build <br />out schedule. <br />Randall Tillman, the project developer, stated $1,456,274.00 will be <br />paid in Adequate Public Facility fees and that only 99 building permits were <br />requested in 2008. <br />Commissioner Privette made a MOTION to delay this consent agreement <br />until adequate school capacity is available. Commissioner Mynatt seconded <br />the motion. <br />There was a discussion on how long the project would be delayed. <br />John Day, County Manager, suggested the motion include language that is <br />definite as to when capacity will exist. If the. date of capacity is <br />uncertain, he said the action will be difficult to defend legally. <br />Mr. Koch advised the motion should contain a definite date as to when <br />the Board would consider the schools to be adequate so the project could move <br />forward. Otherwise, he said the motion has the effect of an indefinite <br />moratorium on the project. <br />There was a brief discussion that the Board should be mindful of <br />setting a precedent and how that may affect future rulings on consent <br />agreements. <br />Vice Chairman Juba asked Mr. Tillman if the build-out schedule could be <br />amended. <br />Mr. Tillman reviewed the proposed build-out schedule and pointed out <br />the project is already phased for a five-year period. He. commented on the <br />number of costly studies that have been completed for this project and asked <br />the Board to take that into consideration. He said all the rules have been <br />followed and that he is being treated unfairly. <br />There was further discussion. <br />Grady Cook, property owner, reported the number of lots has been taken <br />into consideration and that other developments across the river were approved <br />with a higher phasing schedule. <br />Mr. Tillman interjected that this project is participating in a <br />regional wastewater pump station that the City of Concord is installing on <br />the other side of the .river which will serve the entire drainage basin. He <br />also commented on the return of investment and responded to further questions <br />from the Board. ~. - <br />Ms. Watts stated the developer may not be able to pull all 99 permits <br />in 2008 due to a delay in getting construction drawings approved by the City <br />of Concord. <br />