Laserfiche WebLink
June 4, 2007 (Work Session) Page 393 <br />Jonathan Marshall, Commerce Director, commented on the two aspects of <br />the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance - the draft ordinance and the <br />resolutions adopted in the past establishing the percentage of mitigation <br />developers are asked to voluntarily contribute based on the capital costs <br />incurred by the County for school construction. He also reported <br />Commissioners Mynatt and Privette attended a recent stakeholders meeting held <br />to receive input from the community on possible changes to the Adequate <br />Public Facilities Ordinance and possible increase of the mitigation amount. <br />He recommended the resolution be updated to include the new capital costs <br />established by the TishlerBise study; remove the voluntary mitigation payment <br />' figures from the draft ordinance; and readopt the voluntary mitigation amount <br />annually based on a multiplier to be provided by TishlerBise. <br />Mike Downs, Deputy County Manager, pointed out the draft ordinance does <br />not contain a provision that would allow the Board to postpone development <br />until adequate school seats are available. <br />Mr. Marshall explained the draft ordinance is set up so if schools are <br />found to be inadequate in years 2 through 15 of the 15 Year Plan, it allows <br />the developer to propose mitigation, to schedule mitigation as well as make <br />mitigation payments. He said if the Board only wants to allow scheduling, <br />then the language of the draft will need to be changed. <br />Commissioner Mynatt commented on the possibility of adopting the <br />resolution now and adopting the ordinance at a later time. A general <br />discussion ensued. <br />At the request of Chairman Carruth, Mr. Downs provided an update on the <br />results of a recent stakeholders meeting. Highlights of his report included <br />the following: the stakeholder members included representatives of the area <br />Building Association, Realtors' Association, municipalities, the Chamber of <br />Commerce, both school districts and several at-large members; the discussion <br />was very informative; the realtors and builders were opposed to any increase <br />in the voluntary mitigation payment; the stakeholders would like to make the <br />voluntary mitigation payment when the house is sold; the stakeholders would <br />like to receive preliminary approval from the Board early in the process or <br />' at the time the preliminary plat is submitted rather than waiting until the <br />end of the process when considerable time and expense has already been <br />expended; and the municipalities realize there is a growth problem and each <br />was willing to make a commitment to resolve the issue. <br />Commissioner Mynatt also addressed additional concerns from the <br />stakeholders such as: the affect on existing homeowners buying a new home <br />within Cabarrus County; and getting an additional tax dedicated to roads and <br />schools approved. <br />There was also a general discussion on the location of county <br />regulations regarding traffic impact analysis, possible impacts on <br />developers, the solution to the problem needs to be multifaceted and demand <br />for houses, etc. <br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Juba, seconded by Com:c~i ssioner Mynatt and <br />unanimously carried, the Board voted to place the APFO policy changes on the <br />June 18, 2007 agenda as a New Business item and further agreed to address the <br />draft ordinance changes at a later date. <br />Mr. Day suggested drafting changes to the draft ordinance that <br />addresses some of the issues raised by the stakeholders and convening an <br />additional stakeholders meeting to let them view the changes and provide <br />feedback. <br />Emercenev Medical Services - Ambulance Billing Process <br />' Mike Downs, Deputy County Manager, introduced David Hampton, Director <br />of Emergency Medical Services, Margaret Selby with the County's Finance <br />Department and Philip Averett with EMS Management & Consultants, Inc. Mr. <br />Downs reported a study had been conducted of the ambulance billing process; <br />staff is currently collecting approximately 50-52 percent of the ambulance <br />bills; and an additional employee was added to the department several years <br />ago to help increase payment collections, but the collection rate has not <br />improved. He further reported the Department proposes to outsource the <br />ambulance billing and contracting with EMS Management & Consultants, Inc., <br />for a one-year contract which includes an 8 percent fee based on collections. <br />Finally, he reported the fee is inline with what other counties pay and <br />identified several counties that use this firm. <br />