Laserfiche WebLink
July 23, 2007 (Regular Meeting) <br />Page 503 <br />2. The funds are limited to use by the local Department of Social <br />Services, Work Force Development Program or the community <br />transportation system. <br />3. The funds may be transferred to the Elderly and Disabled Transportation <br />Assistance Program or the Rural General Pubic Program after an <br />assessment of employment transportation needs in the service area <br />indicates that employment transportation needs are substantially being <br />met. This assessment will occur prior to any transfer of funds and <br />following submission of a statement to that effect from the County <br />Manger to the Public Transportation Division. <br />Rural General Public <br />1. The funds are limited to use by the community transportation system. <br />2. The funds will not be used to provide human service agency trips. <br />WITNESS my hand and official seal, this 23`a day of July, 2007. <br />Attest: <br />/s/ Kav Honeycutt <br />Kay Honeycutt, Clerk to the Board <br />/s/ Robert W. Carruth <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />Chairperson <br />State of North Carolina <br />County of Cabarrus County <br />Facilities - Public Hearing - 6:30 <br />/s/ John Day <br />John Day, County Manager <br />~r Public School <br />The Chairman announced that this was the date, place and hour fixed by <br />the Board of Commissioners for a public hearing concerning a proposed plan of <br />financing in an aggregate principal amount of up to $8,500,000.00, which plan <br />would involve the entry by the County into one or more installment financing <br />contract(s) with one or more third parties pursuant to North Carolina General <br />Statutes 160A-20, as amended, the proceeds of which would be used to pay all <br />or a portion of the costs of acquiring real property, constructing, <br />renovating and equipping new public school facilities, expansion or <br />renovation of existing public school facilities, various real and personal <br />property improvements related to the foregoing and a portion of the interest <br />to accrue under the installment financing contract(s) during the construction <br />period (collectively the "Project"), and under said one or more installment <br />financing contract(s) the County would secure the repayment by the County of <br />the moneys advanced pursuant to such one or more installment financing <br />contract(s) by granting a security interest in and lien on all or a portion <br />of the Project, which Project was described in the revised notice of public <br />hearing published in The Independent Tribune on July 9, 2007 (the "Notice"). <br />The Board of Commissioners first ratified and approved the designation <br />of the meeting as a public hearing on the proposed plan of financing, the <br />call of the public hearing and publication of the Notice. <br />It was then announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately <br />hear anyone who might wish to be heard on such matter. <br />No one appeared, either in person or by attorney, to be heard on such <br />matter or the advisability of the plan of financing and the Clerk to the <br />Board of Commissioners announced that no written statement relating to said <br />matters had been received by the Clerk or the Finance Director. <br />It was then announced that the public hearing was closed. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />The Board took a short break at 8:09 p.m. Chairman Carruth reconvened <br />the meeting at 8:28 p.m. <br />(G-4) Discussion of Detention Center Design and Construction <br />ChairmanCarruth reported the Board agreed to discuss the jail housing <br />unit at the request of Commissioner Mynatt. Chairman Carruth provided an <br />overview of the jail construction project, including the approval of a <br />Condition Use Permit by the City of Concord, subsequent litigation, failed <br />mediation attempts and the upcoming hearing in the N.C. Court of Appeals. <br />Commissioner Mynatt spoke at length on the jail project. She reviewed <br />the project's timeline; commented on the controversy that developed when the <br />