Laserfiche WebLink
September 4, 2007 (Work Session) Page 538 <br />Planning and Zoning Board on June 21, 2007. She said the consent agreement <br />includes a payment of $9,039.00 per lot, due at final platting, to advance <br />school adequacy and the following build-out schedule: no more than 57 lots <br />platted in 2009, no more than 62 lots platted in 2010, no more than 69 lots <br />be platted in 2011 and no more than 55 lots platted in 2012. She also <br />mentioned that Phase 1 of the project consisted of 997 single-family lots <br />that was approved by the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning Board in July <br />2006. Further, she said a consent agreement was approved by the Board in <br />March 2007 and included the payment of $9,034.00 per lot due at final <br />platting to advance school adequacy and the following build-out schedule: no <br />more than 35 lots platted in 2007; no more than 121 lots platted in 2008; no <br />more than 123 lots platted in 2009; no more than 126 lots platted in 2010 and <br />no more than 92 lots platted in 2011. The total lot count for Phase 1 and 2 <br />was identified as 735 and a cumulative build-out schedule was provided. <br />Finally, she reported the developer would like to enter into a second consent <br />agreement for Phase 2. <br />Ms. Watts and Jonathan Marshall, Commerce Director, responded to <br />questions from the Board pertaining to the number of remaining phases and who <br />developed the proposed build-out schedule. Mr. Marshall pointed out there <br />could be additional phases if the developer acquired more land and that the <br />build-out schedule was pushed out to 2006 and 2009 as directed in the past. <br />Commissioner White MOVED to table the Consent Agreement for Rustic <br />Canyon Subdivision until the October 2007 work session. <br />Commissioner Privette seconded the motion. <br />There was further discussion on the build-out schedule. <br />After discussion was held, the MOTION carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Marshall also commented on the additional levels of review <br />subdivision projects will go through under the new Adequate Public Facilities <br />Ordinance and the choices the Board will have to address capacity. He also <br />responded to a variety of questions from the Board. <br />of Understanding Between Cabarrus County & North <br />Debbie Bost, Cooperative Extension Director, reported the partnership <br />between N.C. Cooperative Extension at NC State University and A & T State <br />University along with County governments must be outlined in writing and <br />agreed to on a regular basis. She said the State is paying a larger portion <br />of salaries in the East and is trying to move all counties to the same level <br />of services. She said the goal is a 50/50 agreement where 50 percent of the <br />salary is paid by the State and 50 percent is paid by the County. She <br />reported Cabarrus County is already in compliance with the new agreement and <br />has been for a number of years. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner White, seconded by Commissioner Privette <br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to place the Memorandum of <br />Understanding between Cabarrus County and North Carolina Cooperative <br />Extension on the September 17, 2007 Agenda as a Consent item. <br />Proposed Organizational Structure Changes - Parks and Recreation Department <br />Londa Strong, Parks and Recreation Director, presented the following <br />proposed changes to the organizational structure of the Parks and Recreation <br />Department: <br />Current Positions Proposed Positions Action <br />Parks Director Parks Director <br />Barks Development Mgr. Park Program Manager Reclassification <br />Athletic Program Sup. Park Program Manager Title/responsibility change <br />Administrative Asst. Administrative Asst. <br />Parks Superintendent Parks Superintendent <br />Administrative Sec. Administrative Sec. <br />Park Ranger - F/T Park Ranger - E/T <br />Park Ranger - F/T Park Ranger - F/T <br /> Park Program Supervisor New Position <br />She also highlighted the proposed organizational chart and the <br />salary/benefit summary. It was noted that no additional funding is required <br />to implement the proposed changes. <br />