Laserfiche WebLink
<br />April 3, 2006 - Agenda Work Session <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />552 <br /> <br />There was general discussion on the repercussions of waiting until the <br />total construction cost is known before securing the financing and the <br />Board's past decision to utilize Certificates of Participation (COPS) to <br />finance the jail construction project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Privette stated projects of this magnitude should be <br />presented to the voters to approve the use of General Obligation (GO) bonds. <br />He said GO bonds have a cheaper interest rate and, in approving the project, <br />the citizens would approve any additional property tax needed to cover the <br />debt for that project. <br /> <br />There was discussion about the GO bond proposal. Issues addressed <br />included the following: (1) Bond referendum on the November election would <br />create an eight -month proj ect delay; (2) Continued escalation of the cost of <br />construction materials; (3) the amount of funds borrowed since 1999 without a <br />vote of the people; and (4) Board's responsibility to handle the County's <br />finances in a responsible manner. <br /> <br />commissioner Freeman suggested Certificates of Participation be used to <br />finance the Jail Annex and that the Board discuss the use of General <br />Obligation bonds to finance the remainder of the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Day explained the first stage of the financing package would be for <br />the Annex and site work and the second stage would be the remainder of the <br />project. He said the not-to-exceed amount included in the resolution would <br />be for both parts of the project in order to avoid any further delays. <br /> <br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Juba, seconded by Commissioner Carpenter <br />and unanimously carried, the Board agreed to place the Resolution authorizing <br />the filing on an application for approval of a financing agreement on the <br />April 17, 2006 Agenda as a New Business item. <br /> <br />Furnishing and Equipment Option in Ware Bonsall Contract <br /> <br />Kelly Sifford, Community Development Manager, reported the Law <br />Enforcement Center/Jail project will require a great deal of furniture and <br />equipment. She stated work should begin as soon as possible in planning those <br />needs. She said Ware Bonsall Architects offers furniture and design services <br />at a cost of $49,500.00 as an option to their original contract. <br /> <br />Glenn Ware with Ware Bonsall Architects reported the built-in inmate <br />furniture would be part of the construction package; however other areas will <br />have movable pieces of equipment, chairs, tables, etc. He said the bulk of <br />the equipment will be located in the Sheriff's office for workstations that <br />are hard-wired into the electrical system. Mr. Ware explained the importance <br />of coordinating the design and planning of the equipment and furniture with <br />the building and electrical plans. <br /> <br />Mr. Day stated the County could solicit proposals from other providers <br />or exercise the interior design option in the contract with Ware Bonsall <br />Architects. He said proposals could be received on April 17th and presented to <br />the Board at its meeting on the 17th. <br /> <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carpenter, seconded by Vice Chairman Juba <br />with Chairman Carruth, Vice Chairman Juba and Commissioner Carpenter voting <br />for and Commissioners Freeman and Privette voting against, the Board agreed <br />to place the furnishings and equipment programming for the Sheriff's Office <br />and Detention Center on the April 17, 2006 Agenda as a New Business item. <br />Proposals for those services received by April 17 from other providers will <br />be considered at that meeting along with the Ware Bonsall contract option. <br /> <br />Request by piedmont Preservation Foundation - Money Ear.marked for Demolition <br />of the Cline and Propst Houses <br /> <br />Janet Magaldi, President of piedmont Preservation Foundation (PPF) , <br />requested funds that would have been spent for the demolition of the Cline <br />and Propst houses be donated to PPF. She stated it was her understanding the <br />demolition cost had been estimated at $16,000.00. <br /> <br />Commissioner Carpenter reviewed actions taken by the Board in securing <br />the houses for PPF and selling land to PPF for placement of the houses. Also, <br />she stated the County had phased out donations to non-profit organizations <br />over a five-year period. <br /> <br />Commissioner Privette stated PPF saved the County $16,000.00 in <br />demolition costs for the two houses. <br />