My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2006
>
BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2006 8:54:40 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />September 5, 2006 (Recessed Meeting) <br /> <br />Page 95 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Day asked Ms. Zakraisek to discuss the intent, rationale and how <br />these are supposed to work with the surroundings. <br /> <br />She read the following intent statement for the MDR zone as follows, <br />"The district is intended to permit development with a moderately high <br />densi ty community character. This district allows open space and amenity <br />subdivisions. Residential development options for this zone include a <br />variety of housing types, including townhouses. These zones are located <br />where public utilities either are available or envisioned within the next ten <br />years." She also read the following rationale for the MDR zone as follows: <br />"This district is designed to provide permanent protection for those who want <br />to live in a moderately high density residential environment. This district <br />is designed to provide the principal location for a wide variety of <br />residential types." In a MDR district, she said one might find detached <br />single family homes, attached single family homes (townhouses or row houses) <br />and amenity subdivisions with open space. <br /> <br />Although a high density residential/mixed use district is not proposed, <br />she read a portion of the intent statement as follows, "This district is <br />iGtended to allow for a wide range of residential uses and will be the <br />primary location for multifamily development." She reiterated the applicant <br />is not requesting high density residential in this application. In this <br />zoning district, she said each single family attached homes would have its <br />own lot, would not be considered as multifamily and would require a <br />subdivision plat. <br /> <br />For the Office/Institutional (O/I) district, which is how the property <br />is currently zoned, she read the intent statement as follows, "This district <br />is intended to accommodate relatively low intensity office and institutional <br />uses at an intensity complementary to residential land use. Where <br />appropriate, this district can serve as a transition between residential land <br />use and higher intensity non-residential land use." For example, she said an <br />office/institutional area can serve as a transitional zone between commercial <br />areas and residential areas. She said the office/ insti tutional area may <br />include a church, school or office building. She presented the following <br />rationale for the OI zone as follows: "This district is used to provide for <br />low intensity office and institutional uses that can be complementary to <br />adjacent residential land use. This district features employment options and <br />essential services which require a moderate number of average daily trips. <br />Those uses will have a minimum impact on the surrounding area because these <br />trips will generally occur during regular business hours, thus, not competing <br />with residential traffic at peak hours and weekends. This district should be <br />located adjacent to residential zones or in areas where its use would serve <br />as a transition between residential land use and higher intensity non- <br />residential land use. Higher intensity non-residential land use may include <br />commercial zones, light industrial or mixed use zones. When bordering <br />residential zones, care should be taken to ensure natural or manmade <br />buffering and/or architectural compatibility so that the nonresidential <br />activities are not a nuisance to residential use." She explained the OI zone <br />would serve as a transitional zone and based on the design standards, which <br />do apply in the OI zone and would include required buffers, building <br />placement, parking behind the buildings and screening from residential areas. <br />She also read the following intent statement for the General Commercial (GC) <br />zone: "The primary purpose of this zone is to provide locations for large <br />scale commercial activities. This level of commercial activity usually draws <br />clientele regionally as well as from nearby neighborhoods, requires siting on <br />maj or thoroughfares and requires relatively large-scale off street parking. <br />The zone will accommodate a wide variety of office, retail and lodging land <br />uses. General commercial may boarder the other less intense commercial zone <br />or either of the two industrial zones. A general commercial zone may boarder <br />a higher density residential zone but care should be taken to assure a buffer <br />between the two." She said these areas include shopping centers, commercial <br />uses, office buildings, mixed-use areas and there could be more intensive <br />commercial uses there such as auto repair. Next, she read the GC rationale <br />as follows: "This district is intended to provide the principal location for <br />large scale commercial development in Cabarrus County." She explained this <br />zone is where uses would go that may have nuisances like noise or generate a <br />lot of traffic requiring off-street parking. She reported this information <br />is what staff considers when reviewing a straight rezoning. <br /> <br />Chairman Carruth asked what makes this project consistent with the Land <br />Use Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Zakraisek reported the draft Land Use Plan calls for this area to <br />be a mixed use. She said the definition in the ordinance says a mixed-use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.