BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

September 5, 2006 (Recessed Meeting) Page 82 1. All development must be in accordance with the site plan and building elevations as submitted by the applicant. In the event a site or elevation change is necessary, the applicant agrees to submit to the Planning and Zoning Board for review and approval of such change. (Planning) 2. Residential development shall not commence until public utili ties are available to the site. (APFO/Utilities/Emergency Services) 3. For the project to develop as proposed with individual parcels, a preliminary plat shall be submitted for the review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Board. (Planning/Zoning) 4. Approved uses for the proj ect shall be in accordance with the list of uses submitted as a part of this application. (Planning/Zoning) (See Application) 5. Applicant/developer must complete/install all roadway improvements in accordance with NCDOT requirements (see page 46-47 and Figure 10.1 of Revised Traffic Impact Analysis for Wallace Site sealed 6/15/06 by Adam Novak, PE). (APFO/NCDOT) 6. All driveway and access permits are subj ect to review and approval by NCDOT. (APFO/NCDOT) 7. All non-residential development must comply with Cabarrus County Commercial Design Standards and shall be subj ect to final approval by the Planning and Zoning Board acting as Design Review Committee. (Planning) 8. Applicant agrees to submit site plans and elevations for all sites designated as "future" when such plans are available. Individual site plan and architectural approval shall be granted by the Planning and Zoning Board. (Planning) 9. Residential development shall be subject to anti-monotony standards in the Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance. Applicant shall work with Staff for administrative review and approval of all architectural elevations and shall submit an architectural inventory prior to permitting any of the residential units. (Planning/Zoning) After reviewing the staff report, Ms. Zakraisek responded to a variety of questions regarding: the intent statements; the difference between the original application and this rezoning request; ability to modify the project; could a concrete plant be added to the project at a later date; the time frame to add the residential and retail component of the proj ect; the storage of trucks at the site; under the current zoning classification, could the subject property be used as a future school site; capacity at the elementary, middle and high school; condemnation of property for right-of- ways; and, the storage of chemicals on the site. She also reviewed the list of permitted uses in the Medium Density Residential and General Commercial zones. Chairman Carruth questioned the absence of a grocery store on the list of permitted uses. Ms. Zakraisek reported the grocery store must have been left of the list of permitted uses. Recess of Meeting At 7:06 p.m., Chairman Carruth recessed the meeting for a short break. Chairman Carruth reconvened the meeting at 7:16 p.m. Permitted Uses At the request of Chairman Carruth, Ms. Zakraisek reviewed the second page of permitted uses in the General Commercial Zone which she said was not included in the packets. She apologized for the oversight. Proponents Fletcher Hartsell, Jr., of 129 Overbrook Drive NE, Concord, speaking for the Wayne Brothers, provided the following background information on the company: the concrete construction company was formed in 1985, employs approximately 250 employees and is located in northwest Cabarrus County; the company wants to expand its operations, but cannot grow due to the express limitations of the critical area of the Coddle Creek Reservoir and restrictions of the Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance. He said Mr. Wayne wants to remain in the northwest area, there is only one piece of property that is closely associated with this type of advanced development and he has a contract on a portion of this property that belongs to the Wallace family, who are also the co-applicants in this petition. He reported the prior