Laserfiche WebLink
November 20, 2006 (Regular Meeting) Page 167 <br />391 Union Street S., Concord; Ed Hopper of 633 Union Street S., Concord and <br />Debra Arbes of 398 Union Street S., Concord, as set forth in Appendix A. <br />The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners announced that no written <br />statement relating to said matters had been received by the Clerk or the <br />Finance Director. <br />All of the foregoing statements were duly considered by the Board of <br />Commissioners. <br />It was then announced that the public hearing was closed. <br />Exhibit A <br />Donna Ludwig of 212 Union Street N. in Concord stated everyone is <br />pleased to see the progress on the new Jail Annex. When completed, she said <br />it will provide the necessary relief for the overcrowding the jail has <br />experienced for years and will save money by not sending prisoners to other <br />counties. Throughout the last year, she said members of the Citizens for a <br />Better Concord have contributed untold hours and energy in trying to alter, <br />not stop, the project. She said they have always supported a downtown jail, <br />but the site selected for inmate housing is too expensive and challenging to <br />build on. She said the challenges include a steep slope, soil that is <br />riddled with refuse, an unexpected layer of solid rock and most important for <br />the future, the size of the property is too small for future expansion. She <br />reported this expensive site is completely land locked and the lack of room <br />for future expansion is a huge point, one that has been largely overlooked. <br />She reported ChairmanCarruth originally said he was looking fifty years into <br />the future for planning and his original goal has evolved into a facility <br />that will be filled and outdated in as few as fifteen years. She said not <br />only is the Board spending a vast amount of taxpayer money, they are spending <br />it on a project that. has no future and the County will be back in the same <br />position in a few short years. In closing, she stated the County is <br />embarking on the next phase of the project and she urged the Board to <br />reassess the original plans in light of the new information on cost, utility <br />inadequacy and disruption to downtown Concord. <br />After objecting to providing his home address for the record, Brad <br />Barnett of 338 Eastover Drive SE in Concord stated the Board will vote <br />tonight on the contract with Turner Construction for Phase 2 of the jail <br />project. He said supposedly, this was to be a "no risk" contract, meaning <br />the risk was capped for the County and the citizens of Concord. He said it <br />is the other way around. He said this is turning into a no risk for Turner <br />Construction and all the subcontractors to follow. If you read the <br />newspaper, he said you know that you and your fellow citizens are all paying <br />and continue to pay for the series of mistakes the architects, engineers and <br />contractors have made after four years of extensive planning. He said with <br />satellite imaging and laser technology, he said a building was missed by <br />eight to twelve feet that has been there for over 100 years. He asked who is <br />going to wind up paying for mistake. He said the citizens are used to <br />"getting it" from this Board and it will be the citizens of Cabarrus County <br />who will pay for this mistake. If anyone thinks they are going to come up <br />with a cap on this, he said they are sadly mistaken. He said the tunnel <br />miscalculation is thereal reason the tunnel has had to be filled in and dug <br />out again, not because' of rain, faulty soil or the unknown location of <br />utilities. He said the fact that no seismic testing was done to find out <br />about a layer of solid rock would be Site Prep 101. If you do not have to <br />concern yourself with who will be paying once you get in there and find out <br />there is more work to be done, he said there is no sense in going to that <br />step. He said the surrounding neighborhoods know about the sound and <br />disruption to the community and it is time to ask tough questions and to be <br />honest, which is hard;to do. He said someone famous said, "If are in a hole, <br />quit digging." He said it is looking more like an open ended project and <br />smells like the situation in Iraq with Halliburton. <br />Tracy Ballard of 187 Virginia Street SE in Concord said she has <br />followed the progress of the project with special interest. For her <br />families' sake, she said she is glad to have the Annex to reduce the <br />overcrowding and give the deputies a secure enclosed area to transport <br />prisoners. Like many of her neighbors, she said she has fought the bad <br />placement of the big jail housing unit. One reason, she said, is the unit is <br />seventy-seven times the size of the houses surrounding it. She reported <br />exactly one year ago,. citizens asked the City if the old water pipes could <br />handle such a huge facility; at that time, the question was ignored. She <br />said recently, the County plans to spend over a million dollars to replace <br />water pipes and askedwhat is going to happen when the County finally admits <br />the sewer pipes cannot handle the jail as well. She stated the County will <br />go in, tear up the roads, tear up the yards and that is more money the County <br />