My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2006 11 27 RECESSED
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2006
>
BC 2006 11 27 RECESSED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2009 1:04:31 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:04:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
11/27/2006
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 27, 2006 (Recessed Meeting) <br />Page 183 <br />city of Concord have caused an estimated $15 million increase in <br />the cost of the facility, due to rising costs of construction <br />materials, as well as the uncertainty of approval of the project. <br />This is equivalent to the cost of one school. Wi11 the <br />additional $15-20 million spent awaiting a decision from the <br />Appeals Court have an effect on the ability of the County to <br />build schools? <br />3. This board has been asked to participate in the TIF <br />financing for the NC Research Campus, which has the very real <br />potential of defining the future of our county for generations to <br />come. Will the cost of the delays lead to our being unable to <br />provide for many of the infrastructure improvements that the <br />public will demand, as we begin to feel the effects of the campus <br />and new residents moving into the county? <br />Although citizens should always have the right to express <br />concern and tolodge protests with their governing bodies, our <br />very democratic and representative form of government is set up <br />to ensure fairness prior to decisions, and clear direction once <br />those decisions are made. For over 200 years, this county has <br />worked remarkably well, and the downtown Concord community has <br />seen harmony between private enterprise, governmental services, <br />public safety and residences. Now, due to continued legal <br />challenges of a handful of downtown residents, whose median home <br />prices are 66 percent higher than the overall county, the entire <br />county, to include our teachers, law enforcement officers, <br />families, working folks, and senior citizens, will bear the brunt <br />of their actions in the escalated costs that the county, and the <br />city, will have to bear as a result of their actions. <br />At this point in time, the Cabarrus County Board of County <br />Commissioners continues to assess all options, to include legal, <br />to resolve this matter in a way that ensures our obligations are <br />met and that we do so in such a way that best protects the public <br />safety and hard earned resources of the citizens and taxpayers of <br />Cabarrus County. <br />(C) Receae to the Multipurpose Room <br />At 6:10 p.m., Chairman Carruth recessed the meeting in order for the <br />Board to relocate to the Multipurpose Room. <br />The meeting reconvened at 6:25 p.m. <br />(D) Tax Increment Financing (TIF) - North Carolina Research Campus <br />(D-1) Review of TIF Legislation and Issues <br />Steve Cordell, the County's Bond Attorney, gave a brief presentation on <br />the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in North Carolina. Highlights of the <br />presentation included the following: <br />• TIF debt can be issued in North Carolina to finance public <br />improvements in a development financing district. <br />• The primary source of repayment for the TIF debt contemplated by the <br />NC statutes will be the incremental increase in ad valorem tax <br />revenues in the District - ad valorem tax revenues attributable to <br />the assessed '. value in the District in excess of the base valuation <br />of the District when formed. <br />• As a means of attempting to assure there will be sufficient <br />incremental ad valorem tax revenues generated in the District to <br />service the TIF debt, the TIF statute permits the issuer of the TIF <br />debt to enter into "minimum valuation" agreements for ad valorem tax <br />assessment purposes with property owners in the District. <br />• There's an ,inherent payment/bankruptcy risk associated with a <br />private owner's contractual payment obligations under a minimum <br />valuation agreement. <br />• If the project that will be the subject of the TIF debt will affect <br />tax revenues in more than one unit of local government, then those <br />units can enter into an InterLocal Agreement that specifies each <br />unit's commitment to the project. <br />Joe Niggel, USB Securities, LLC, presented information concerning the <br />County's participation in the TIF through an InterLocal Agreement. Based on <br />preliminary conversations with one of the rating agencies (Moody's), he <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.