Laserfiche WebLink
<br />June 16, 2005 - work Session <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />236 <br /> <br />new zoning and subdivision ordinances. We have had numerous <br />meetings with builders and developers. We have met with county <br />staff, planning board members, and commissioners. We have <br />attended three workshops and a commissioners meeting and have <br />heard the concerns of numerous individuals from Odell and other <br />communities. We feel that the planning staff and consultants <br />have worked diligently to script a document which addresses the <br />concerns of all sides. The ordinance, as currently drafted, <br />requires compromise on the part of both developers and the <br />outspoken critics of growth. <br /> <br />The most contentious parts of the ordinance deals with density <br />and open space. As currently drafted, the new ordinance lowers <br />densities and preserves open space without putting new homes <br />totally out of reach for most of Cabarrus County residents. The <br />primary concern of the building industry is to keep housing <br />affordable for our citizens. We hope that the county commission <br />shares that concern. Suggestions have been made that the county <br />should prohibit new homes on lots of less than one acre and <br />should require up to 50% open space. In effect, that would <br />necessitate a density of one home per almost two acres. Raw land <br />in Cabarrus County which is served by water and sewer currently <br />is valued at $25,000.00 to $50,000.00 per acre. One to two acre <br />requirements would translate into $100,000.00 - $150,000.00 lots <br />which would necessitate homes priced in excess of $500,000.00. <br />That's more than three times the average sale price of a home in <br />Cabarrus County and out of reach for the vast majority of our <br />citizens. It begs the question: where are these people supposed <br />to live? <br /> <br /> <br />The proposed map, labeled UCommittee Recommendation" and the <br />attached spreadsheet contain densities, open space requirements, <br />and minimum lot sizes that we feel most landowners, the building <br />industry, and slow growth advocates should be willing to accept. <br />Most of the unincorporated parts of Cabarrus County are not <br />served by water and sewer and densities of one acre are <br />appropriate. In reality, much of the county's land cannot <br />support well and septic on one acre parcels, thereby, <br />necessitating even larger lots. The MDR and HDR zones which <br />allowed 4.5 to 6 units per acre have been virtually eliminated. <br />The LDR zone is limited to areas served by public water and <br />sewer. To achieve densities of 1.5 - 2 units per acre a great <br />deal of property will be required to be set aside as common open <br />space. These are major down zonings and not everyone is going to <br />be happy about them but they are rational. <br /> <br />We also strongly feel that the new ordinance should not try to <br />dictate design criteria of new homes and should not address types <br />and locations of building materials or style. Design criteria <br />are a matter of personal preference and should be determined by <br />the market. <br /> <br />These are numerous other issues on which all sides will argue but <br />if compromise can be reached on the issues herein addressed I <br />feel that a fair and reasonable ordinance can be approved which <br />addresses the concerns of all citizens of Cabarrus County. We at <br />the Cabarrus County Building Industry Association hope that you <br />will consider our suggestions and recommendations. <br /> <br />Yours truly, <br />Isl William T. Niblock <br />william T. Niblock, Representative of the Cabarrus County <br />Building Industry Association <br /> <br />.....--....: ....~. <br />