My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2004 04 20 RECESSED
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2004
>
BC 2004 04 20 RECESSED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2006 10:14:15 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
4/20/2004
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 20, 2004 Page 433 <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes/General Accounts <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carruth, seconded by Commissioner Privette <br />and unanimously carried, the Board approved the minutes/general accounts of <br />Closed Sessions on July 28, 2003 and November 17, 2003(A) as written and <br />authorized the release of those minutes/general accounts. <br /> <br /> Chairman Freeman read the following statement relative to the release <br />of the minutes/general accounts of Closed Sessions: <br /> <br /> In the spirit of cooperation, Cabarrus County voluntarily is <br /> releasing the minutes from two closed-session meetings of its <br /> Board of Commissioners. At the closed-session meetings of July <br /> 28, 2003, and November 17, 2003, commissioners invited Attorney <br /> James Scarbrough to provide factual information regarding <br /> potential and actual litigation contemplated and/or brought by <br /> his clients, Craft Homes and Morrison Development, against <br /> Cabarrus County and the City of Concord. <br /> <br />The Charlotte Observer, in an article printed April 15, 2004, <br />quoted City of Concord Manager Brian Hiatt as stating the County <br />and two developers are in "collusion" regarding matters <br />pertaining to these lawsuits. The Charlotte Observer article <br />further alleges that the County violated the Open Meetings Law <br />when Scarbrough, attorney for the plaintiffs, met with the Board <br />of Commissioners in closed session on two occasions. <br />Cabarrus County adamantly denies engaging in any "collusion" with <br />any party, at any time. At the two closed meetings in question, <br />Scarbrough attended the meetings for the limited purpose of <br />presenting factual information, and then left prior to any <br />discussion regarding potential litigation. <br /> <br />The current county attorney has not found any precedent in the <br />state of North Carolina that states the presence of opposing <br />counsel, for the sole purpose of presenting his client's position <br />with regard to pending or threatened litigation against the <br />County, automatically waives the County's attorney-client <br />privilege. <br /> <br /> While Cabarrus County voluntarily elects to release for public <br /> review the minutes of the closed meetings in question, this <br /> election is not to be deemed a waiver of the County's right to go <br /> into closed session regarding certain matters and its right to <br /> maintain attorney-client privilege as provided by North Carolina <br /> law. <br /> <br />Recess of Meeting <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carruth, seconded by Commissioner Carpenter <br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to recess the meeting at 7:55 p.m. <br />until 11:00 a.m. on Monday, April 26, 2004, at the Cabarrus County <br />Governmental Center. <br /> <br />Clerk to the Board <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.