Laserfiche WebLink
August 25, 2004 Page 614 <br /> <br /> The Board of Commissioners for the County of Cabarrus met in special <br />session at 6:00 p.m. on August 25, 2004, in the Commissioners' Meeting Room <br />at the Cabarrus County Governmental Center in Concord, North Carolina. ' The <br />purpose of the meeting was to consider the following items: (1) Conduct <br />public hearing on Order authorizing $94,900,000 School Bonds and Order <br />authorizing $3,100,000 Community College Bonds, Consider Adoption of Bond <br />Orders and Passage of Resolution Calling Bond Referendum; (2) Bid Award for <br />the Rowan-Cabarrus Community College Highway 29 Business and Technology <br />Center; (3) Architectural Services Contract with Ware Bonsall Architects for <br />the Law Enforcement Center/Jail Project; (4) Proposed escrow restructuring <br />strategy; (5) Contributions for the advancement of school adequacy; and (5) <br />Closed Session to consult with the County Attorney to preserve the attorney- <br />client privilege and discuss pending litigation as authorized by North <br />Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a) (3). <br /> <br />Present - Chairman: Robert M. Freeman <br /> Vice Chairman: Richard D. Suggs <br /> Commissioners: Carolyn B. Carpenter <br /> Robert W. Carruth <br /> Coy C. Privette <br /> <br /> Also present were John D. Day, County Manager; Marilyn D. Porter, <br />County Attorney; Frankie F. Bonds, Clerk to the Board; and Kay Honeycutt, <br />Deputy Clerk to the Board. <br /> <br /> Chairman Freeman called the meeting to order at 6:06 p.m. <br />Chairman Suggs was not present for the beginning of the meeting. <br /> <br />Vice <br /> <br />Commissioner Privette gave the invocation. <br /> <br />Contributions for the Advancement of School Adec~uacy <br /> <br /> Jonathan Marshall, Commerce Director, responded to questions raised by <br />the Board on August 16 regarding contributions for advancement of school <br />adequacy. He advised that graduated fees or a percentage fee on a house <br />would be difficult as the impact is basically the same for a $50,000.00 house <br />as it is for a $500,000.00 house. He stated staff continues to explore an <br />option for a program similar to the County's tax incentives where the payment <br />is the same but there can be some return based on some criteria established <br />by the Board. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall discussed the issue of exemptions for non-profit housing, <br />such as homes by Habitat for Humanity or the Community Development <br />Corporation, and housing for the elderly. He said the Board could choose to <br />offer a rebate of the adequacy requirement and/or establish a grant program <br />such as the one in Durham County. Mr. Marshall pointed out the need for some <br />type of restriction on housing for the elderly to ensure there would be no <br />children coming from that house to the schools for the life of the house or <br />for the long term. <br /> <br /> Vice Chairman Suggs arrived at 6:17 p.m. and was present for the <br />remainder of the meeting. <br /> <br /> There was discussion regarding school facility needs and the <br />advancement of school adequacy, including the donation of land and <br />infrastructure improvements. Mr. Marshall responded to a number of questions <br />regarding ~school construction fees" and ~school impact fees." <br /> <br />Chairman Freeman read the following statement: <br /> <br />The issue of providing adequate facilities for our growing <br />student population is one of the most significant we face. <br /> <br />We must do it somehow. The schools systems' 10 year capital <br />plans and other obligations will result in debt service equal to <br />23% of the county's general fund budget by 2007. Continued <br />financing of school projects will raise that number to nearly 30% <br />in 2012. <br /> <br />Based on current Local Government Commission policies and <br />practices, we won't be allowed to take on that much debt. That <br />means we will have to raise money to begin pay-as-you-go school <br />building projects. Depending solely on property taxes for <br />funding them will result in ridiculously high tax rates that will <br />bring growth to a halt and burden our citizens far beyond what is <br />reasonable. <br /> <br /> <br />