Laserfiche WebLink
January 27, 2003 Page 29 <br /> <br />grant application for the Fishertown/Princeton Park area. Previously, CDBG <br />grant applications have been prepared by County staff or by Bob Stark, <br />Consultant. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Suggs, seconded by Commissioner Privette <br />and unanimously carried, the Board instructed staff to contact Hobbs, <br />Upchurch and Associates regarding the preparation of a Community Development <br />Block Grant application for the Fishertown/Princetown Park Community. <br /> <br /> It was suggested that residents of the community prepare a letter <br />regarding the community's sewer needs for Board members to submit to the <br />County's Congressional delegation during an upcoming meeting in Washington. <br /> <br />(F-4) Patrick Highway 49 Rezonin~ Petition - C02-03 (R) <br /> <br /> Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning and Zoning Services Director, explained <br />the process to rezone property from a general category to a Special Use <br />district, including the need for sworn testimony and findings of fact. <br /> <br /> County Attorney Hartsell and the Clerk affirmed those persons wishing <br />to address the Board during the public hearing on Petition C02-03(R). Each <br />speaker then affirmed that he/she had been sworn prior to addressing the <br />Board. <br /> <br /> Chairman Freeman opened the Public Hearing for the Patrick Highway 49 <br />rezoning petition. The Notice of Public Hearing had been published in THE <br />INDEPENDENT TRIBUNE on January 13 and 19, 2003. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall presented Petition C02-03(R) by the Patrick 49 group to <br />rezone 90.728 acres of property (PIN #5528-14-5461) on Highway 49 from <br />Limited Industrial (LI) to General Industrial Special Use (GI-SU). He stated <br />the Petition originally went to the Planning and Zoning Commission as a <br />General Industrial zoning and was approved by a 4-3 vote on December 19. <br />Since that was not a super majority, the Petition was automatically forwarded <br />to the Board of Commissioners. Further, Mr. Marshall advised that the <br />petitioner has amended the petition to a Special Use rezoning based on the <br />comments and information offered at the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />meeting. Mr. Marshall presented a map showing the general area of the <br />property on Highway 49 at Stough Road (future southern end of the Westside <br />Bypass) and outlined the following information concerning the petition: (1) <br />There are adjoining zoning districts of General Industrial and Limited <br />Industrial as well as nearby residential neighborhoods across the railroad <br />right-of-way; (2) Petition is in compliance with the 1991 Harrisburg Area <br />Plan that showed a mix of industrial uses and future employment along Highway <br />49; (3) Specific use is a salvage yard that does involve outdoor storage and <br />does require the General Industrial zoning; and (4) The rezoning is a Special <br />Use rezoning as the petitioner has eliminated some uses from the General <br />Industrial district. In conclusion, Mr. Marshall stated that staff <br />recommends approval as other factors necessary for industrial zoning are in <br />place, including adjacent General Industrial zoned property, major rail line, <br />major highway and water and sewer service. <br /> <br /> Mr. John Carmichael (Attorney representing the petitioner) stated the <br />petitioner is the Patrick Highway 49 LLC and Jeffrey B. Turnball, who are <br />owners of the property. He stated that Verastar has a contract interest in <br />the property and it is likely, if the rezoning is approved, that Verastar <br />will close on the property and develop it in the manner to be presented <br />during the meeting. However, he pointed out that the development by Verastar <br />is not 100 percent sure even if the property is rezoned. Mr. Carmichael <br />explained the petition had been converted to Special Use rezoning in order to <br />eliminate certain uses that were objected to at a prior hearing and to give <br />assurances to some nearby property owners. He compared a listing of <br />permitted uses in the General Industrial and Limited Industrial districts and <br />stated the petitioner was eliminating the following uses as a part of the <br />Special Use rezoning request: Asphalt and/or concrete plants; Chemical <br />manufacturing; Slaughter house/meat packing; Warehouse, volatile materials; <br />Landfill, demolition (one acre or less); Landfill, demolition (more than one <br />acre); Landfill, sanitary; and Race tracks, animal and mechanical. Mr. <br />Carmichael advised that a potential use (salvage yard) of the site and <br />proposed conditions would be addressed during the presentation. However, he <br />pointed out that, if the rezoning is approved, the site could be used for any <br />of the uses attached to the rezoning petition that are currently allowed in <br />the General Industrial district. <br /> <br /> Mr. Carmichael then introduced Mrs. Janet Covey of Verastar to provide <br />information regarding the petition. He questioned her on various issues <br /> <br /> <br />