BC 2002 01 28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

January 28, 2002 Page 270 Cooperative Extension - 4-H School-Age Care Grant and Related Budget Amendment UPON MOTION of Commissioner Fennel, seconded by Commissioner Privette and unanimously carried, the Board approved the 4-H School-Age Care Grant of $15,000.00 received by the Cabarrus County Cooperative Extension Service from the North Carolina State University, and adopted the following budget amendment. BUDGET REVISION/AMENDMENT REQUEST DEPARTMENT OF NC Cooperative Extension Service AMOUNT: $ 15,000.00 TYPE OF ADJUSTMENT: Supplemental Request PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Grant money awarded for 4-H School-Age Care Rated License Program Present Account No. Approved Budqet 00165435-6332 $ 0.00 4-H School-Age Care Grant Increase Decrease $15,000.00 Revised Budqet $ 15,000.00 00195435-9330 Tools & Minor Equipment 00195435-9610 Travel $ 0.00 $14,862.00 $ 14,862.00 $ 0.00 $ 138.00 $ 138.00 Granting of utility Pipeline Easement to Public Service of North Carolina, Inc., as Rec~uested by LandCraft Properties for the Canterfield Estates Subdivision The Board received the request from LandCraft Properties to grant a utility pipeline easement to Public Service of North Carolina, Inc. to serve the Canterfield Estates Subdivision. On November 19, 2001, the Board had approved a request by LandCraft for two telephone easements and a~water line easement on property recently dedicated to the County. The second telephone easement was in error and should have been an easement for the gas pipeline. UPON MOTION of Commissioner Fennel, seconded by Commissioner Privette and unanimously carried, the Board granted a utility pipeline easement to Public Service of North Carolina, Inc. as requested by LandCraft Properties to serve the Canterfield Estates Subdivision. The easement will consist of approximately .0264 of an acre and is described as "Easement 2" as shown on a plat of survey by McKim & Creed entitled "Easement Survey for Telephone and Gas Easements for Canterfield, LLC", dated September 26, 2001. Further, the Board authorized the County Manager to execute the Utility Pipeline Easement on behalf of Cabarrus County. NEW BUSINESS Appeal of Subdivision Request C02-01(S) Mount 0live Estates and Consideration of Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Donation Ms. Kelly Sifford, Senior Planner, presented Petition C02-01(S), preliminary plat approval for the Mount Olive Estates Subdivision located in Township 7 on Mount Olive Road. The developers (Edward L. Duke and Bryant L. Parnell, Jr.) plan to develop 14 lots on approximately 20.88 acres. The Planning and Zoning Board voted 5-3 in favor of approving the subdivision on its technical merits, but voted 4-3 to deny the subdivision based on its Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) inadequacies. As indicated by correspondence dated January 18, 2002, from Sam King, Jr., PE/PLS of King Engineering of Concord, Inc., the developers are appealing the Planning and Zoning Board's denial of the preliminary plat and are pledging $7,000.00 (14 lots @ $500.00) to advance adequacy of public schools in the area affected by the proposed development. Commissioner Fennel questioned the size and value of homes to be built in the subdivision. Ms. Sifford stated she did not have that information, but advised that the homes would be "stick-built" homes by Duke Builders. Also, she confirmed that the developers would use well and septic facilities in the subdivision. Commissioner Privette questioned the location of the proposed subdivision, its school district and the status of school enrollment in that district. Ms. Sifford advised that the property is located in the Mt. Pleasant School District and that there are a few seats available in that district. However, she explained the total capacity for the entire system is used in considering APFO issues as school lines are adjusted after development occurs in different areas of the county. According to Ms. Sifford, there are over 7,000 lots approved in Cabarrus County that could be built on tomorrow. However, she indicated that some of these lots (rezonings) have been approved for a number of years.