Laserfiche WebLink
March 26, 2002 Page 318 <br /> <br />Amtrak Station <br /> <br /> Mr. Legg presented a status report on the new Amtrak Station in <br />Kannapolis. Architects are working on the design of the project, which is <br />expected to go out for bid next year. Public input is being received <br />concerning the use of some of the space in the facility. He thanked the Board <br />for the County's financial support of that project. <br /> <br />Leadership Forum <br /> <br /> Ms. Woodford invited the Board of Commissioners and Kannapolis City <br />Council to.participate in a Focus Forum for elected officials on April 16 at <br />the NorthEast Medical Center. <br /> <br />Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and Unified Development Ordinance <br /> <br /> Councilman Geathers introduced discussion concerning the need for the <br />County to grant extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of at least one mile to <br />the City or for the County to adopt the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). <br />He stated this would help prevent problems in those areas that are annexed by <br />the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Legg reviewed the importance of ETJ areas for development of <br />infrastructure such as curb, gutter, and sidewalks and for growth management. <br /> <br /> The Board discussed concerns regarding the UDO regulations that have <br />been put into place by the local municipalities and indicated that it is not <br />likely the County will adopt the UDO. Also, Board members expressed <br />opposition to the granting of ETJ, stating that persons living within the ETJ <br />do not have the right to vote for City officials. As a compromise, Vice <br />Chairman Carruth proposed the possibility of setting up a special zoning <br />district or a "transition" zone for those areas around the cities where there <br />would be unified growth management and development standards. <br /> <br /> Mr. Day reported that consideration of the UDO is scheduled to come <br />back to the Board in April, having been tabled for one year in April 2001. <br />He suggested that County and municipal staff members work together to <br />identify areas targeted for future annexation and to establish zoning and <br />development standards in those areas that are similar to those that will be <br />put into place when'annexation occurs. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Fennel <br />and unanimously carried, the Board deferred consideration of the proposed <br />Unified Development Ordinance until April 2003; and, in an effort to achieve <br />a benefit to the municipalities similar to that of extraterritorial zoning <br />authority, while still ensuring that residents have the opportunity to vote <br />for those who impose zoning and development regulations upon them, the Board <br />directed County planning staff to work with municipal planning staffs to <br />identify areas slated for annexation and develop county-administered zoning <br />and development standards to put in place in those areas that are similar to <br />those that will be imposed by the municipalities upon annexation of those <br />areas. <br /> <br />Adjournment <br /> <br /> There being no further business to come before the Board, Chairman <br />Freeman adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Clerk to the Board <br /> <br /> <br />