Laserfiche WebLink
493 <br /> <br />to the Department of Transportation traffic study for Highway 73 at a total <br />estimated cost of $1,714,436.00. In addition, Mr. Burkett will cap the <br />maximum number of dwelling units at 1,430 at final build-out with <br />construction to be phased as follows: 150 new dwelling units in Year 1, 175 <br />in Year 2, 180 in Year 3, 200 in Years 4, 5, and 6, 190 in Year 7 and 135 in <br />Year 8. These totals are cumulative. Further, the office construction will <br />be limited to zero square feet in Year 1, 60,000 in Years 2, 3 and 4, and <br />50,000 per year thereafter. These totals will also be cumulative. Further, <br />there is a commitment by Mr. Burkett to assist with the Highway 73 <br />improvement efforts. The Board believes the evidence and submittals of the <br />petitioner support the following facts: <br /> <br />1. The rezoning proposal is supported by the long range comprehensive plan <br /> for the area which specifically promotes well integrated mixed use <br /> developments as a desirable. This fact is supported by the adopted <br /> Western Area Plan. <br />2. The proposed development will affect area transportation systems, but <br /> these effects are mitigated by improvements that the Petitioner has <br /> agreed will be a condition of the rezoning. In addition, the Petitioner <br /> has offered partial funding of feasibility study for improvements to NC <br /> Highway 73. The Traffic Impact /knalysis, North Carolina Department of <br /> Transportation review of that analysis, Petitioner's submittals and <br /> Petitioner's testimony support these facts. <br />3. Mixed uses within the development will further lessen traffic impact. <br /> This statement is supported by the Traffic Impact Analysis as was <br /> presented to the Board. <br />4. School enrollment impacts will be addressed through the donation of <br /> property for new school construction, the value of which is beyond <br /> anything given thus far. The Petitioner's submittal and previous Board <br /> of Commissioners actions to address school adequacy support this fact. <br />5. The general area of this rezoning is changing due to public <br /> infrastructure improvements and private development. This statement is <br /> supported by previous actions of the Board of Commissioners, the Water <br /> and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County, and the development approvals for <br /> Skybrook on Harris Road, Highland Creek off Ellenwood and Christenbury <br /> Road, and the Booe/Untz development off Shiloh Church Road. <br />6. Fiscal impact analysis information provided by the Petitioner shows the <br /> effective tax base for each home would exceed the level at which tax <br /> revenues are generally greater than the cost of required services. This <br /> fact is supported by the spreadsheet prepared by the Petitioner and <br /> submitted as a supplement to their petition. <br /> <br />Consideration of Resolution Authorizinq the Exchange of Real Property (0del% <br />School Tract for a 61-Acre Tract (proposal withdrawn by the Developer) <br /> <br /> The Board acknowledged that Mr. Robert Burkett had withdrawn the <br />proposal for the acquisition of Odell School. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Chairman Fennel, seconded by Commissioner Privette and <br />unanimously carried, the Board moved to terminate consideration of the <br />Resolution concerning the Odell School property. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Barnhart proposed that the Board consider appointing a 15- <br />member committee of Odell Community residents to look at future potential <br />uses for the Odell School when it is vacated. He also proposed the <br />establishment of such a committee in the Midland area for the Bethel <br />Elementary School. Potential uses for the school property could include <br />community activities, parks and recreation purposes, etc. <br /> <br /> The Board by consensus asked staff to put together information <br />regarding broad parameters concerning future potential uses of the two school <br />properties and the proposed establishment of the committees. This <br />information will be brought back to the Board at the August meeting. <br />Commissioner Barnhart volunteered to work with staff on this issue. <br /> <br /> There was discussion about a number of issues concerning old school <br />facilities and their future use, including how to determine in which <br />communities buildings are torn down and in which communities they are <br />maintained, how to pay for future uses and the fairness of taxing County <br />residents to fund a community center in one particular area such as the Odell <br />Community. <br /> <br /> The Board also discussed the status of the Poplar Tent Beautification <br />District and advisory committee. Commissioner Carpenter was asked to check <br />with Mr. Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr., County Attorney, and give a report at a <br />future meeting regarding the District. <br /> <br /> <br />