My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 1999 09 20
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
1999
>
BC 1999 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2002 3:44:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
9/20/1999
Board
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
307 <br /> <br />Rule 18. Debate. <br />The chair shall state the motion and then open the floor to debate, presiding <br />over the debate according to these general principles: <br /> (1) The member making the motion or introducing the ordinance, <br /> resolution, or order is entitled to speak first. <br /> (2) A member who has not spoken on the issue shall be recognized <br /> before someone who has already spoken. <br /> (3) To the extent possible, the debate shall alternate between <br /> opponents and proponents of the measure. <br /> <br />Rule 19. Procedural Motions. <br />(a) In addition to substantive proposals, the procedural motions listed in <br />subsection (b) of this rule, and no others, shall be in order. Unless <br />otherwise noted, each motion is debatable, may be amended, and requires a <br />majority vote for adoption. <br /> comment: This rule substantially departs from RRO. Each procedural motion in RRO <br /> was reviewed to determine whether it as appropriate for use by a small board; <br /> substantial modifications and deletions were the result. The following <br /> enumeration of procedural motions is exhaustive; if a procedural option is not <br /> listed, it is not available. <br /> (b) In order of priority (if applicable), the procedural motions are: <br /> Comments: While a substantive motion is out of order if another substantive <br /> motion is pending, several procedural motions can be entertained in succession <br /> without necessarily disposing of the immediately pending one. The order of the <br /> list below establishes which procedural motion yields to which--for example, a <br /> move to defer consideration (6) may be made while a move to refer to committee (9) <br /> is pending because (6) ranks higher on the list. <br /> 1. TO Adjourn. The motion may be made only at the conclusion of <br /> action on a pending matter; it may not interrupt deliberation of <br /> a pending matter. <br /> Comment: This motion differs from the RRO motion in several respects. In RRO, it <br /> is not debatable or amendable and can be made at any time, even interrupting <br /> substantive deliberations. In view of the small number of members and the <br /> available procedures to limit debate, this rule allows debate and amendment of the <br /> motion to adjourn but allows this motion only when action on a pending matter is <br /> over. The motion to defer consideration or to postpone to a certain time and day <br /> may be used if the board wants to adjourn before completing action on a matter. <br /> 2. TO Take a Recess. <br /> comment: RRO does not allow debate on this motion, but since the number of members <br /> is small and procedures to limit debate are available, this rules allows debate on <br /> the motion. As in RRO, the motion is in order at any time. Note that under Rule <br /> 12, the chair also has the power to call a brief recess. <br /> 3. TO Call to Follow the Agenda. The motion must be made at the <br /> first reasonable opportunity or it is waived. <br /> comment: This motion differs from the call for the orders of the day in RRO: it <br /> may be debated and must be made when an item of business deviating from the agenda <br /> is proposed, or the right to insist on following the agenda is waived for that <br /> item. <br /> 4. TO Suspend the Rules. The motion requires a simple majority <br /> vote. <br /> Comment: This motion differs from RRO except in that it is debatable and <br /> amendable, and the number of necessary votes depends on the number of members in <br /> attendance providing that there is at least a quorum. Thus if there are five <br /> members present, at least three members must vote for the motion; if only three <br /> members are at a particular meeting, at least two must vote for the motion in <br /> order to adopt it. It is in order when the board wishes to something it may <br /> legally do but cannot without violating its own rules. The procedure will pose <br /> some problems for a three-member board, as manipulating the rule to prevent one <br /> member from participating in deliberations is possible. Frequent use of the <br /> motion to prevent one member from presenting proposals or from speaking on an <br /> issue is of doubtful legality. A three-member board may decide to require a <br /> unanimous vote to suspend the rules. <br /> 5. TO Divide a Complex Motion and Consider It by Paragraph. <br /> Comment: This motion is like the division of a question and consideration by <br /> paragraph in RRO except that it is debatable. <br /> 6. To Defer Consideration. A substantive motion whose consideration <br /> has been deferred expires one hundred (100) days thereafter, <br /> unless a motion to revive consideration is adopted- <br /> comment: This motion, which replaces the motion to lay on the table in RRO, was <br /> renamed to avoid confusion. It allows the board temporarily to defer <br /> consideration of a proposal. It differs from RRO in that it may be debated and <br /> amended, and in that a deferred motion dies if not taken up by the board (via a <br /> motion to revive consideration) within one hundred (100) days of the vote <br /> deferring consideration (in RRO a motion laid on the table dies at the end of that <br /> particular session of the assembly). One hundred (100) days is the suggested time <br /> for deferring consideration because it is also the time within which a proposed <br /> ordinance must be enacted (see Rule 26). <br /> 7. TO Call the Previous Question. The motion is not in order until <br /> every member has had one opportunity to speak. <br /> comment: This motion differs from the one in RRO. The RRO motion is always in <br /> order, is not debatable or amendable, and requires a two-thirds vote for adoption. <br /> Thus, it may compel an immediate vote on a proposal without any debate on the <br /> issue. Such a device may be necessary to preserve efficiency in a large assembly, <br /> but with a small board, a minimum period of debate on every proposal strikes a <br /> better balance between efficiency and effective representation by all members. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.