|
13
<br />
<br />A. L. Brown - renovation of home
<br /> economics
<br />A. L. Brown - renovation of Bullock
<br /> gym floor
<br />A. L. Brown - new cafeteria
<br />Shady Brook Elementary -
<br /> classroom additions (all
<br /> Cabarrus County)
<br /> Total
<br />
<br /> 65,000 49,855
<br /> 130,000 99,710
<br />
<br />1,380,000 1,058,460
<br />1,050,000'* 1,050,000'*
<br />
<br />$5,015,972
<br />
<br />$4,129,181
<br />
<br />* Based on total cost of project times 76.7% for Cabarrus CountyVs share.
<br />**Ail Cabarrus County funding as no students from Rowan County attend the
<br /> school.
<br />
<br /> During review of the CIP requests, there was lengthy discussion regarding
<br /> the proposal by Mr. Michael M. Ruffin, County Manager, that Cabarrus CountyWs
<br />~share of funding for the Kannapolis City Schools be based upon the number of
<br /> Cabarrus County students within the Kannapolis City Schools rather than within
<br /> the total Cabarrus County School population. Using this method of funding,
<br /> Cabarrus County would provide 76.7 percent of funds and Rowan County would
<br /> provide the remaining 23.3 percent. It had been the past policy of both Cabarrus
<br /> and Rowan Counties to allocate funds to the Kannapolis City Schools based upon
<br /> average daily membership (ADM) on a county-wide basis. Based on that formula,
<br /> Cabarrus County had appropriated 79.5 percent of its total schools funding to
<br /> the Cabarrus County Schools and 20.5 percent to the Kannapolis City Schools.
<br /> Mr. Henry Duncan, Chairman of the Kannapolis Board of Education, and Mr.
<br /> Farrar Griggs, member of the Kannapolis Board of Education, each expressed
<br /> concern relative to Mr. Ruffin's proposed method of funding for the Kannapolls
<br /> City.Schools. Each asked that the school system receive its fair share of
<br /> funding from Cabarrus County. Also, Mr. Griggs urged communication between the
<br /> Cabarrus and Rowan officials in order to insure that the two counties arrive at
<br /> a consistent policy for funding the Kannapolis City Schools.
<br /> Mr. Ruffin announced that a dinner for the Board of Commissioners and
<br /> Kannapolis City Council was scheduled for Friday, January 25, 1991, at PityWs
<br /> Sake Lodge in Kannapolis. He noted that the occasion was a social function and
<br /> no public business would be discussed.
<br /> Board members were reminded of the meeting scheduled for 4:30 P.M. on
<br /> Monday, January 14, 1991, at which time the Social Services staff will present
<br /> information relative to the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) Training
<br /> Program.
<br /> Mr. Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr., County Attorney, presented for the BoardVs
<br /> consideration a resolution relative to the constructive tender for the airport
<br /> project.
<br /> UPON MOTION of Vice-Chairman Barnhart, seconded by Commissioner Carpenter
<br /> with Vice-Chairman Barnhart and Commissioners Carpenter, Hamby, and Payne voting
<br /> for, the Board adopted the following resolution:
<br />
<br /> Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and leave of the
<br />Superior Court entered effective December 31, 1990, in that action
<br />entitled "City of Concord, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff vs.
<br />Cabarrus County, a Political Subdivision of the State of North
<br />Carolina, Defendant", bearing File No. 90 CVS 2291, in the office
<br />of the Clerk of Superior Court for Cabarrus County, North Carolina,
<br />the Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners moves, nunc pro tunc to
<br />December 31, 1990:
<br />
<br /> 1. To reject the City of Concord~s constructive tender of
<br />the sum of $630,000.00 due in conjunction with a contract, the
<br />enforceability of which is at issue in the above-referenced action.
<br />
<br /> 2. To tender constructively to the City of Concord the
<br />return of the sums of $15,099.86 and $1.00 previously paid by it in
<br />conjunction with a contract, the enforceability of which is at issue
<br />in the above-referenced action.
<br />
<br /> 3. Acknowledging the City of Concord~s refusal to accept
<br />the tender, to maintain the sums of $15,099.86 and $1.00 in a
<br />separate, segregated investment account and invest such sums in
<br />
<br />
<br />
|