My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 1990 07 09
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
1990
>
BC 1990 07 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2002 3:28:39 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:10:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
7/9/1990
Board
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
445 <br /> <br /> Mr. Michael M. Ruffin, County Manager, reported that Mr. David Polston, <br />architect, had evaluated all bids and recommended that the single prime bid be <br />awarded to Liles Construction Company of Concord. He noted that the following <br />major subcontractors chosen by Liles Construction were all Cabarrus County <br />contractors: Electric - County Electric: Heating and Air Conditioning - Harkey <br />Brothers; Plumbing - Kannapolis Service Company; and Grading/Site Work - Brown's <br />Grading and Landscaping. Also, Mr. Ruffin advised the Board that a change order <br />will be presented at a later date relative to the air conditioning system and <br />fireplace for the Senior Center. <br /> UPON MOTION of Chairman Lentz, seconded by Commissioner Moss and <br />unanimously carried, the Board awarded the single prime contract for the Cabarrus <br />county Senior Center to the low bidder, Liles Construction Company, in the amount <br />of $739,400.00. <br /> Chairman Lentz presented a Cabarrus County lapel pin to Ms. Martha Miller <br />in appreciation of her extraordinary efforts in raising the necessary funds for <br />the Senior Center. <br /> Ms. Angela Ferguson, Aging Director, presented an update on the work by <br />the Cabarrus County Aging Task Force in developing a local grassroots plan for <br />serving senior adults. This work is being conducted in response to a mandate to <br />present regional findings to the North Carolina General Assembly in March 1991 <br />relative to service priorities and the identification of issues concerning the <br />services provided to the older adults. In conclusion, Ms. Ferguson asked that <br />the Task Force be an ongoing committee operating under the umbrella of the <br />Cabarrus County Council on Aging Advisory Board. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Melvin, seconded by Commissioner Moss and <br />unanimously carried, the Board authorized the Chairman to execute the <br />Certifications for the County Service Priorities and Issue Identification Survey <br />and the Supplemental Resource Survey for Fiscal Year 1990. The Resource Survey <br />identified contributions of local agencies, both public and private, that provide <br />services to the elderly in Cabarrus County. The service priorities and issues <br />as identified by the Task Force were as follows. <br /> <br />SERVICE PRIORITIES <br /> <br />There exists an increased need for financial staff resources <br />for in-home service, such as chore and respite as alternatives <br />to institutional care. <br />There exists a need for additional housing to meet the diverse <br />needs of Cabarrus County elderly; particularly addressing the <br />continuum of income and functional abilities. <br />There exists a need for adequate transportation to serve, both <br />rural and urban elderly populations. <br /> <br />ISSUE IDENTIFICATION SURVEY <br /> <br /> The Aging Task Force identified the following issues and <br />recommended action from the State: <br /> <br /> o <br /> <br />5. <br />6. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />There is a need for state wide role clarification with aging <br />issues, i.e. what systems are responsible for specific <br />services? Who has the lead in planning? <br />There appears to be concerns regarding training requirements. <br />Are we requiring too much training for certain program (chore, <br />respite, transportation)? <br />There appears to be lack of "uniform language" when discussing <br />programs. Varies significantly from state to state. <br />The zeitgeist is appropriate for a uniform definition of <br />elderly i.e. age 60 and over? Age 65 and over? <br />Increased funding for in home services. <br />A funding for home repairs. (No money is currently available <br />for home repairs in Cabarrus). <br />Increase networking of human service agencies at the local <br />level. <br />Increased funding for wellness programs such as comprehensive <br />health screenings, senior games and exercise programs. <br />More education available to middle adults to better prepare <br />them for retirement. <br />Increased funding for Adult Day Care facilities. Many in need <br />of the service are not eligible for government assistance yet <br />cannot afford to pay privately. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.