Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />September 13, 2022 <br /> <br />until the appeal period expires on the Shelly case. If he lets it go, which Mr. Koch is hoping he <br />will, that will finally be the end of that case. <br />No Directors Report <br />Ms. Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager addressed the Board stating that she has two <br />things for this evening. One was actually included in the Board packet, that is the proposed <br />Planning and Zoning Commission realignment. <br />What Staff is proposing is to use a different map from what is currently being used. There have <br />been so many annexations that our northwest area, a lot of it is now Kannapolis. So, it is pretty <br />difficult to find people there. In the Central Area, there have been a lot of annexations down <br />toward that area. The land and parcels that we had are dwindling. <br />What we are going to propose to the Board of Commissioners, would be that the proposed <br />member assignments better align with the annexation agreements that are in place, and also the <br />proposed utility service areas. <br />What that would mean for this Board, would be that the Central Area Plan representative would <br />be removed and that would not be replaced because it is part of the Concord area. The Mount <br />Pleasant area that you see would be a new area. We happen to have a current member that could <br />fill that slot, and that would be Mr. Dagenhart. He would represent Mount Pleasant. The <br />Northwest area position is currently vacant and that would not be replaced, that would become <br />part of the Kannapolis area. <br />We currently have two at-large members, the new at-large members would be at three. We <br />would remove the two positions (Central Area and Northwest Area). There would be an at-large <br />member position, a new one. That brings the actual area representatives to a total of nine, which <br />is what we currently have and then there would be three at-large alternate positions. <br />Hopefully, this will open up some additional opportunities for us to solicit members and then <br />would also allow for better representation in those planning areas. <br />We have been talking about this for a couple of years. Mount Pleasant has adopted their own <br />land use plan. We would like to co-adopt that plan and this would correspond to that area. The <br />yellow is the Eastern Area. Kannapolis has their own plan, and she thinks it was a 2015 plan and <br />she does not know if they are updating that. <br />she thinks was a 2035 plan. We have the co-adopted one with Harrisburg. The <br />Town of Midland, we have a plan there, but they also co-adopted their own plan which is a 2030 <br />plan. These boundaries would better reflect the land use plan areas, because essentially, with <br />Concord, Kannapolis and Harrisburg, anything that is in their utility service boundary eventually <br />will be in their municipal limits. <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />