Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />October 11, 2022 <br />Mr.Johnson said no, he is saying that he needs AT&T to speak to that, he cannot speak to that. <br />That was his point. <br />Mr. Corley said sure. <br />The Chair asked if there was anyone else on the Boardwanting to speak. <br />Mr. Wise would like to hear what AT&T has to <br />Mr. Goldberg thinks the best way to do it is to go ahead and close the Public Hearing and the <br />applicant will be able to resume the rebuttal period and you will be able to have that interchange. <br />Mr. Brett Rockett MOTIONED, SECONDEDbyMr. Jeffrey Corley to close the Public <br />Hearing. The vote was unanimous. <br />Mr. Johnson didwant to speak withMr. Corley. One thing that he did not mention isthere is a <br />collocation statement affidavit in the file that speaks directly to that, that other alternatives were <br />looked at.It speaks to that, looking at other alternativeswithin the area that AT&T was <br />searching, so that is in there. The other Attorney had mentioned that it was not, but that is in <br />there. <br />The Chair said there are 168pages, he asked if Mr. Johnson could pull that up. <br />Mr. Goldberg said on the PDFit is page 67,on the listing it isExhibit E. <br />Mr. Corley said that is the Certificate of Compliance. <br />Mr. Johnson said that is the Certificate of Compliance with the FCCrules that the other Attorney <br />mentioned, that was in the record.The collocation certification is on page 68and the State <br />Historic Office approval is right here (showed on the slide).Hementioned that that was not <br />included and thatisin the record on page 146. <br />Mr. Paxton said what about the question on coordinates. <br />Mr. Johnson will explainthatthat is a great question. There was an earlier FAA donefor a site <br />on this property. But it did not meet the 285-foot setback, so we had to resubmit, which we did. <br />The resubmission was at 230-feet instead of 235, but it had new coordinates, sothat is where the <br />confusion camefromas he saw that earlier FAA report.For the earlier location we had to change <br />it and when you change it you have to resubmit. <br />It is because the way the Ordinance is written, which is unusual. It is written that the setback is <br />285-feet from the outside of the compound to any residential property or property line or <br />31 <br /> <br />