Laserfiche WebLink
Cabarrus County, North Carolina <br />April 29, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />Information Technology, Human Resources, Active Living and Parks, Library, Veterans, Tax, Register of Deeds <br />and Planning), the County's current payroll information and compensation policies, and a list of positions <br />identified by title, current grade, and current salary to be included in the study. <br />3. Department heads were also provided information explaining the purpose of the study and Springsted's <br />approach to conducting the study. Individual meetings were conducted with department heads to collect data on <br />department structure, operations, and staffing along with identifying any specific departmental needs and <br />concerns related to this study. <br />4. Employees and /or their supervisors provided comments concerning how their positions had changed. <br />Employees were asked to respond to questions on characteristics applicable to their position. Each employee's <br />supervisor then reviewed the revised position description for completeness and accuracy and provided any <br />additional information they felt was relevant to the position. <br />5. The Springsted consultant team reviewed each revised position description upon receipt and made preliminary <br />classification decisions. At this initial stage of the process, any apparent discrepancies, conflicts, or omissions <br />were noted. Follow up questions with the County's Human Resources Department clarified several issues. <br />6. Interviews and discussions were conducted with various department heads and employees spanning six (6) <br />different days in April concerning their jobs and how they had changed. <br />7. Springsted developed a comprehensive County approved wage survey. This information was requested from <br />twenty -two (22) public and private agencies identified in consultation with the County to determine the market for <br />certain benchmark positions. Benchmark organizations included: <br />• City of Charlotte, NC • Guilford County, NC <br />• City of Concord, NC • Iredell County, NC <br />• City of Kannapolis, NC • Lincoln County, NC <br />• City of Salisbury, NC • Mecklenburg County, NC <br />• Town of Huntersville, NC • Moore County, NC <br />• Buncombe County, NC • Randolph County, NC <br />• Catawba County, NC • Rowan County, NC <br />• Davidson County, NC • Stanly County, NC <br />• Davie County, NC • Wake County, NC <br />• Forsyth County, NC • York County, SC <br />• Gaston County, NC • Carolinas Healthcare System <br />8. Salary data for ninety -nine (99) benchmark positions were solicited and data for ninety -three (93) positions were <br />utilized in our analysis. Information was gathered on minimum, maximum, and actual wage information for all <br />positions surveyed. In addition, information was gathered on the percent of last increase, bonuses, longevity, <br />deferred compensation, and a wide range of other information. <br />9. The designated County positions were evaluated using Springsted's Systematic Analysis and Factor Evaluation <br />(SAFE®) system to assist in assuring that the internal relationships of positions within the County were equitable. <br />Positions were evaluated based on information provided by employees and their supervisors in the revised <br />position descriptions. <br />10. Utilizing the salary data supplied by comparable organizations and the results of the Systematic Analysis and <br />Factor Evaluation (SAFE®) job evaluation system, each position was assigned to an appropriate salary grade in <br />the County's compensation plan. <br />11. Information concerning the provision of incentives to encourage Inspections staff to obtain a higher level of <br />certifications was obtained and discussed. <br />F -5 Page 106 <br />